[pcp] section 8

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74C821F8BF7 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.570, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZJSwMgBrlfE for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E113121F8B1D for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LT200KXEWPWYB@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:17:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LT200LNDWPWOA@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:17:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AEF97762; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:17:55 +0800
Received: from SZXEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.138) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:17:47 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.58]) by szxeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.138]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:17:44 +0800
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:17:43 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF0AAED40B@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.193.34.158]
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Message-id: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C19635B@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: section 8
Thread-index: AQHMisd6AqbKitDQAEWxdFLEoPIx5w==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AOYX BIOG BYv2 BwYU B58K B9Ki CGLc CR3M EvBK E/yw FeN1 Fwz5 GSyO H9EU I38L I8IP; 1; cABjAHAAQABpAGUAdABmAC4AbwByAGcA; Sosha1_v1; 7; {9C39B782-27DF-4909-8481-C49C3F17CEDC}; dABpAG4AYQAuAHQAcwBvAHUALgB6AG8AdQB0AGkAbgBnAEAAaAB1AGEAdwBlAGkALgBjAG8AbQA=; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:17:51 GMT; cwBlAGMAdABpAG8AbgAgADgA
x-cr-puzzleid: {9C39B782-27DF-4909-8481-C49C3F17CEDC}
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF0AAEC289@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com> <774B240D54DAB844B37EE80C2DD8E8BCB7E9DA@szxeml522-mbs.china.huawei.com> <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF0AAEC2F8@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com> <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF0AAED40B@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Subject: [pcp] section 8
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:18:00 -0000

Hi,
In section 8, it reads:
  "It is REQUIRED that the PCP-controlled device assign the same
   external IP address to PCP-created explicit dynamic mappings and to
   implicit dynamic mappings for a given Internal Host.  In the absence
   of a PCP option indicating otherwise, it is REQUIRED that PCP-created
   explicit dynamic mappings be assigned the same external IP address."
It is not consistent with what we have discussed in the mailing list below. And it is a bit ambiguous in reading.

How about changing the second sentence from on of the 4 candidates as below?

Alternative 1:
PCP client should request same external IP address for an application if there is already any existing explicit mapping for that application.

Alternative 2:
PCP client should request the same external IP address if there are existing explict mappings, unless there is explicit reasons of not doing so, e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-pcp-zones-00

Alternative 3:
It is indicated by the PCP client that PCP-created explicit dynamic mappings be assigned the same external IP address, unless there are explicit reasons of not doing so, e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-pcp-zones-00"

Alternative 4:
It is indicated by the PCP client that PCP-created explicit dynamic mappings be assigned the same external IP address, unless a PCP option indicates different external IP address



Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html