[pcp] PCP Minutes posted

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 03:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4E41AD52B for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:45:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUpxhhrJLGJ5 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:45:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0710.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::710]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FEF1AD52A for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB409.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:44:57 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:44:57 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: PCP Minutes posted
Thread-Index: Ac/9YXF4v396K8x0RpCcNXY/LapKWQ==
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:44:57 +0000
Message-ID: <328ec6f85dd1431589bc97510e2ea72e@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [31.133.166.252]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB409;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB409;
x-forefront-prvs: 0392679D18
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(189002)(2351001)(99396003)(107886001)(107046002)(229853001)(105586002)(106356001)(20776003)(50986999)(120916001)(92566001)(110136001)(86362001)(108616004)(19625215002)(54356999)(21056001)(4396001)(66066001)(64706001)(95666004)(99286002)(15975445006)(87936001)(2656002)(2501002)(101416001)(16236675004)(76576001)(33646002)(19617315012)(15202345003)(46102003)(40100003)(77156002)(86612001)(31966008)(74316001)(19580395003)(122556002)(62966003)(97736003)(450100001)(19300405004)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB409; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_328ec6f85dd1431589bc97510e2ea72eBY2PR03MB412namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/RnnZAyVVdqLE9dZgs0mkGUUeT4o
Subject: [pcp] PCP Minutes posted
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:45:24 -0000

Thanks to Stuart Cheshire for being notetaker, and to Ted Lemon for being Jabber scribe.

The draft minutes from today's meeting are now posted at
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-pcp
Please send any additions/corrections.

And for anyone who was not present in the room, please let us know if there are
objections to the directions to the doc editors taken during the meeting.
Otherwise we will treat this as WG consensus.

-Dave