Re: [pcp] #62: Client-driven or server-driven auth retransmissions

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 24 October 2012 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276AC21F8847 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.171, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xq5KMr+EBVyU for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC3A21F86C9 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-217-126-210.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.217.126.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B4B20348; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:49:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C3038412A; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
References: <059.9cf5d7c12f5da883f5db53fb2786e69b@tools.ietf.org> <tslwqyggjxb.fsf@mit.edu> <5087E2CE.4090201@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:49:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5087E2CE.4090201@toshiba.co.jp> (Yoshihiro Ohba's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:45:02 +0900")
Message-ID: <tslbofsghm1.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] #62: Client-driven or server-driven auth retransmissions
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:49:38 -0000

>>>>> "Yoshihiro" == Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp> writes:

    Yoshihiro> Sam, Your description below did not capture DoS attack
    Yoshihiro> issue with client-driven retransmission that I mentioned.
    Yoshihiro> It would be fair if you could mention it.

Agreed, I'm waiting for that discussion to resolve itself then I'll try
and capture where we are.  I explicitly held off on giving an opinion
about the retransmission issue with regard to PCP because I think our
discussion is still open.


--Sam