[pcp] MInutes posted + Action items

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 10:11 UTC

From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: MInutes posted + Action items
Thread-Index: AQHOLsE1tTJUvP4hakCfnqT0UHLIhw==
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:11:00 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060409028C6B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9092044581B68B479F51B6F6162E093A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [pcp] MInutes posted + Action items
Precedence: list

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-pcp

Summary of action items in no specific order:

- WGLC for PCP Server Selection and gathering of reviewers
- Further clarification on the use of IP address in DHCP PCP Option
- PCP Proxy needs a security section
- PCP Proxy: discussion whether PCP needs a bit about mandatory/optional
to process bit for opcodes
- Create a PCP nested NAT use-case and based on that the required extension
- Radius Extension confirmation of adoption on list
- PCP failure scenarios need to contain only those scenarios not covered
by base spec
- PCP authentication option will star off with option 4
"Servers continue to use same SA to protect messages pertaining to
   that mapping, even if the SA is technically expired."
- PCP authentication draft need updated based on discussion
- Adopt PCP Nat coord as WG document (done)

Thanks,

Reinaldo and Dave

[pcp] MInutes posted + Action items Reinaldo Penno (repenno)