IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pcp] Comments on draft-boucadair-pcp-nat-reveal

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3859E21F9C37 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4DcUCE+a7epe for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0253.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AC721F99DE for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail58-db9-R.bigfish.com (10.174.16.237) by DB9EHSOBE021.bigfish.com (10.174.14.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:47 +0000
Received: from mail58-db9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail58-db9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B42ADC004E for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:autodiscover.service.exchange.microsoft.com; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 2
X-BigFish: VS2(zzc85fhzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1d7338h17326ah18c673h1de096h8275bh8275dh1de097hz2fh2a8h683h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1b0ah1bceh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dc1h1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail58-db9: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=dthaler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail58-db9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail58-db9 (MessageSwitch) id 1375201605120391_20718; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB9EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.16.233]) by mail58-db9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A96A00046 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB9EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.174.14.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:40 +0000
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.114) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.136.1; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:26:39 +0000
Received: from mail219-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.243) by CO1EHSOBE023.bigfish.com (10.243.66.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:44 +0000
Received: from mail219-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail219-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76261000C2 for <pcp@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(199002)(76576001)(76176001)(15202345003)(46102001)(16406001)(74316001)(76786001)(56816003)(77982001)(74366001)(77096001)(4396001)(81342001)(59766001)(51856001)(33646001)(19580395003)(83072001)(83322001)(19580385001)(76796001)(74876001)(74662001)(80022001)(79102001)(19300405004)(16236675002)(47446002)(47976001)(80976001)(74502001)(63696002)(81542001)(53806001)(54316002)(56776001)(66066001)(49866001)(76482001)(50986001)(47736001)(54356001)(69226001)(31966008)(65816001)(74706001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB271; H:BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:130.129.71.226; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail219-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail219-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1375201482274699_15451; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.253]) by mail219-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F40C201DD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by CO1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.243.66.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:34 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB271.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.37.14) by BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.341.1; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:33 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.37.11) by BY2PR03MB271.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.37.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.731.11; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:27 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.171]) by BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.234]) with mapi id 15.00.0731.000; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:27 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-boucadair-pcp-nat-reveal
Thread-Index: Ac6NQG7vUcLtFNomRmezt8uCk0BVeQ==
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:24:26 +0000
Message-ID: <a65a13b1b4a7432e82719d8f2b0f0ed1@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.129.71.226]
x-forefront-prvs: 0923977CCA
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a65a13b1b4a7432e82719d8f2b0f0ed1BY2PR03MB269namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB271.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Subject: [pcp] Comments on draft-boucadair-pcp-nat-reveal
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:27:07 -0000

<personal opinion, no hats>

I read this document, but I don't agree that using PCP is the appropriate way to solve this problem.
The problem described can and should be solved using the existing NAT MIB document in
the Behave WG.

More generally, any scenario requiring querying (but not changing) NAT state by an
authorized entity administered by the same organization is really a management/monitoring
function and should be done by the NAT MIB not by extensions to PCP.

We don't need multiple ways to do the same thing.

-Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email