IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] PCP Server Selection - Address Family Selection

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 25 April 2014 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E10A1A04AF for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vexBknylkU2r for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD741A04CD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:15b:212f:d481:de2b]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 202734034D for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:57:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <535A77E8.7010201@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:57:44 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcp@ietf.org
References: <20140425145138.GC4891@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140425145138.GC4891@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/bMXsxQpm8K_XzpEzroohqwRVRZE
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP Server Selection - Address Family Selection
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:57:54 -0000

Le 2014-04-25 10:51, Sebastian Kiesel a écrit :
> draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-02  says in Section 3:
> 
>    1.  If the PCP client can use both address families when
>        communicating to a particular PCP server, the PCP client SHOULD
>        select the source address of the PCP request to be of the same IP
>        address family as its requested PCP mapping (i.e., the address
>        family of the Requested External IP Address).
> 
> 
> What is the reason for saying it SHOULD use the same familiy as the
> requested EXTERNAL IP address?  I think it would make more sense to use
> the same familiy as the INTERNAL address (if there is a difference at
> all).

+1

I stated this in my review.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email