IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pcp] FW: Consensus from the WG meeting today

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Fri, 09 November 2012 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF2021F86AA for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:12:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQaSJz0-vZku for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A1B21F86AD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 06:12:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1352470377; x=1353679977; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=c8n0ShflS380xo5abNed4mTL7sih4p+EHcsYqpYGELA=; b=K8cPzgKF8uHJC4MAeyUihTZIMLoLkbfZ4+TbugiKYl/7VVJln6DpyrEd 3zDc1v+PbyGVLOAOdfxoZfFFIecUkcylYuR6loZX/IWtxyI120sjGpOhn rZVymw8ENqQnjuLSmte6TPlRRXgPDqJdqMphLMQTA6LB7D8pYLeQHrxWW Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmQJAJ4OnVCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABEw0qBAQeCHgEBAQQSASdRAQgiFEIbAQYFBBMIGodom3aBK6ASkXlhA6RTgWuCb4IZ
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6890"; a="137570416"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2012 14:12:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA9ECuTU016689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:12:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.200]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:12:56 -0600
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Consensus from the WG meeting today
Thread-Index: AQHNvoRQkMPAaynDeUqFmE6cUEHVSg==
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:12:56 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060413B488@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.21.126.82]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19350.005
x-tm-as-result: No--29.877600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9DF174892209594DB53E01B4F0DB41E7@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [pcp] FW: Consensus from the WG meeting today
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:12:57 -0000

On 11/8/12 6:09 PM, "Dave Thaler" <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote:

>The following three items had strong consensus (loud hums for, silence
>against)
>during the meeting today:
>
>1) Add text in pcp-base recommending that when the PCP server receives a
>PEER,
>it should give the flow a longer timeout than when PCP isn't used.
>(Several other
>documents, including requirements documents, have text that depends on
>this
>fact but it's not stated anywhere.)
>
>2) Adopt draft-boucadair-pcp-server-selection as a WG item.  The actual
>content
>was recently separated out of draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp which was already a WG
>doc.
>(This is considered to be part of the existing milestone items, the WG
>just decided
>to split a milestone item into multiple docs.)
>
>3) Adopt draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option as a WG item.   This
>is not
>currently a milestone item.   The chairs will confirm with the AD what
>needs to
>happen.
>
>If anyone on the list has a strong objection, let us know, as we plan to
>move
>forward with the above.
>
>Thanks for everyone's participation in these discussions at the meeting
>today.
>
>-Dave
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email