[pcp] question on PCP proxy
Andreas Ripke <Andreas.Ripke@neclab.eu> Mon, 03 February 2014 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <Andreas.Ripke@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B351A0192 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.436
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kL3mRbSj7K8u for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 01:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C921A0170 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 01:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D9B106B03 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:01:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29+Zu+y8GjTu for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:01:43 +0100 (CET)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A6A106AFD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:01:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.144]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:01:17 +0100
From: Andreas Ripke <Andreas.Ripke@neclab.eu>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: question on PCP proxy
Thread-Index: Ac8gvFDLhr31xMV/QN2urUMIZaUWWA==
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:01:15 +0000
Message-ID: <2D2FFE4726FAF74285C45D69FDC30E79631C65CF@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.215]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D2FFE4726FAF74285C45D69FDC30E79631C65CFDAPHNISofficehd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [pcp] question on PCP proxy
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:01:50 -0000
Hi, I am writing to inquire about the status of draft-ietf-pcp-proxy that recently expired. What are the pending issues with this draft and is there any intention to revive it? Thanks. Best, Andreas NEC Europe Ltd | Registered Office: Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB | Registered in England 2832014
- [pcp] question on PCP proxy Andreas Ripke
- Re: [pcp] question on PCP proxy Simon Perreault