IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00.txt

"bingxuere@gmail.com" <bingxuere@gmail.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB83421F9A0D for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5FRJCbOPEczJ for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE9C21F9A0B for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q11so3338527pdj.38 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=Jq9JBee+M5PsAe9n0Zf7mnB9nMMAaYlTbUNuBW0FPmo=; b=v0MFiPnbymNgZ4RjuEFlscmEgF1ZMsyOumpoHCxPL9oUc7kAgV/lZS+RTsg5wkCk2X Y5ixlzeihY/D33NC5lt5Is0zhMuNjiaaDjuIry+bIay7epgo2VB+6O/+uGR2hOWH4VUD aDlkWLc4YfTdjW/vAQ2i2Cqtzgyx+xw6lVwz9CNf9JFaRWGW0GeWjsqWkjITonEK6REb huQSZlceOco3rMPLUU8jQNYa+Cb6GSq4ej4w/N0jgiFm05q7UwELd9ceUtRnUqykh4Fz t/x7S66azfxr5SnqLT+kKpJ22FEPatd4r1D9OS/9Kfta+gbiDihcGloig1aAFKvRn3SI CJuA==
X-Received: by 10.68.230.195 with SMTP id ta3mr38095803pbc.60.1370525238838; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.9] ([114.254.97.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tb7sm72881873pbc.14.2013.06.06.06.27.15 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20130604085406.11827.2429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51ADD61C.1040106@viagenie.ca> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36ED4CD03C1@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <51B041F6.6040800@viagenie.ca> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36ED4CD0401@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAH3bfAAva2w9L8KEic8S_i5-mT729yiusO7Guio7sOGTP7J2Uw@mail.gmail.com> <51B05964.1080208@viagenie.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <51B05964.1080208@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4BCA290E-BBD9-4AF5-976A-24B9644A62C4@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A8500)
From: "bingxuere@gmail.com" <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:27:13 +0800
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:27:25 -0000

Hi Simon,

On 2013-6-6, at 17:41, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> Le 2013-06-06 11:07, Qiong a écrit :
>>    The hash computation can be updated to rely on IP-based information,
>>    no port numbers would be needed.
>> 
>> [Qiong] That will cost a lot, especially when lwAFTR is deployed in more
>> a centralized way that a lot of routers along the path all need to be
>> updated.
> 
> I think this is a core issue that needs discussion.
> 
> Qiong, are you referring to ECMP?
[Qiong] Right, exactly. Currently, our routers from different vendors even with different versions may implement ECMP differently.

Best wishes

Qiong
> 
> Simon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email