Re: [PEPPERMINT] New name for the WG... consensus desired

"James McEachern" <jmce@nortel.com> Mon, 21 April 2008 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <peppermint-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: peppermint-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-peppermint-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703F13A6F2A; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: peppermint@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: peppermint@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3053A6F42 for <peppermint@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skOyGw9wi3ST for <peppermint@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3C53A6C59 for <peppermint@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.95]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id m3LDsnp10354; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:54:49 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:54:26 -0400
Message-ID: <F1A1D21DA394814E824AC89F5A005BA316D8666E@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080420211312.GB32096@nic.at>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PEPPERMINT] New name for the WG... consensus desired
Thread-Index: AcijK5kqD5d6h2pyTxyoD7uYEZ2cJQAiuv0Q
References: <021601c89aa8$c0a9b5f0$41fd21d0$@us> <20080420211312.GB32096@nic.at>
From: James McEachern <jmce@nortel.com>
To: peppermint@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PEPPERMINT] New name for the WG... consensus desired
X-BeenThere: peppermint@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Provisioning Extensions in Peering Registries for Multimedia INTerconnection <peppermint.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint>, <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/peppermint>
List-Post: <mailto:peppermint@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint>, <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org


  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:peppermint-bounces@ietf.org]
  > On Behalf Of Otmar Lendl
  > Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 5:13 PM
  > To: peppermint@ietf.org
  > Subject: Re: [PEPPERMINT] New name for the WG... consensus desired

  > "drinks" is fine except that it is quite unsuitable for targetted
  > googling.
  > 
  > I'd prefer some word which is not as common.

Interestingly, if you Google "drinks IETF" the top item already points
to this charter discussion.  



_______________________________________________
PEPPERMINT mailing list
PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint