[Perc] Virtual Interim 2/29 and continuing

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 01 March 2016 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1231A87A0 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:12:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgzyeaWFQpSM for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21CED1A8757 for <perc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id e185so152646783vkb.1 for <perc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:11:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=orEm0SnW4W4dUfCpx+VpzslW7Yruu/fCc6cv3fLcces=; b=UDP1ZYJaGjZJ0drrcMzbwdQeoCK9C1R4S8i/Rwiu/nJ/Br/hLC83/nxrv8btOy0Ehi HN9V326h/3TWmM6Nw/3m616trKLP4uGAZIi7XsHRvFjHfY6mFjCXnegxNnuxaCHIKzRx ZG4V/4Ov8cURdZs8uUcJvM94tNivFnir/JwAgZlRNMmjK37EZat7XPY6OWe4MGjUtLsr iPtLjVIUqr2Y6KmIeo/55rPPc0ShZgKheXOfOF7fs5Jujf24wVnZQbUuTsRaN5pBC18C m8ofMppyJPRDT9xpArJ12qWfV8JRDx54iTN87tmMPQFsi89AYKCXBMmI8iC9tIPRKuy5 rEsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=orEm0SnW4W4dUfCpx+VpzslW7Yruu/fCc6cv3fLcces=; b=WOHdSUkP4jx1VSRcaBfRDwSvizwon1JXdNTUhPjmMhYIYJ+vJ1+1ttHrOubLEC65j1 zYvkF0CL1kQoV/yI/TMq07WOjsaXf9H6bcyin8ll9MrOVlWeDYJ88JP0iMgRI2FlHtvm oqn/V732IOXRQEarR3RRZHQs69IqVTTbS0K7fPKOIgoZstbSvgGUisN+3tL1GgPiK+FF H22ThnKu3uLxbHEQ1YE9ycxSu1AYKHjvn01qZSG4Da90z1MQ74sToZ7Z4snrTPa2GKcg Z+Abuh0E47L3g5IHGSVZaXnoWxQERWWMIsxnPF3jeoC8iRMOUP8dYTKg8Tvx6SjmN2nB 1E5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLcTlRz93pV1VoO/yTL7KsxPa6Mij/y9se4GnltIJk1kKyOxE8cSquOrIQtnFe705nQwCkEHzPXsgFq8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.156.129 with SMTP id f123mr13822015vke.40.1456794699175; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.151.85 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:11:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQ_RPELaTJ_frUvJkK-Jn0AJOakh8tJkjXVoYq4a2MGRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: perc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f23c8e25b2052cf272d5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/r8CD4DbT9EKHEiNyFs38xx7j6i4>
Subject: [Perc] Virtual Interim 2/29 and continuing
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 01:12:29 -0000

Hey all,

We had scheduled a virtual interim today to discuss approaches to key
management in some of the current drafts [1][2][3].  Unfortunately, some
critical participants were unable to attend, so we cancelled the call.

The chairs had prepared some introductory slides, and Adam and Cullen
prepared some slides outlining the approaches.  These have been posted to
the proceedings [4].

Since we're getting pretty close to the IETF meeting, I think we'll hold
off on holding further virtual interims.  We'll regroup at the IETF meeting
and figure out how best to work going forward.

Thanks,
--Richard

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-perc-dtls-tunnel
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mattsson-perc-srtp-cloud
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-westerlund-perc-webrtc-use-case
(sorry we missed this in the agenda reading list)
[4]
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/29/perc/slides/slides-interim-2016-perc-3-1.pdf