IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] Double questions

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 27 March 2017 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4212956E for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yAjzmp4vkX1n for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp125.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp125.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F31412948E for <perc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp32.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp32.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9F8995A6D; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:09:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp32.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 5A38C5A34; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:09:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from rtp-vpn2-462.cisco.com ([UNAVAILABLE]. [173.38.117.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:09:49 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B85B4AB1-2A83-4FE0-B4B1-786AFC6E0E36"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <9A3F5BE1-169D-43F0-85F6-BFEB0FBE4D62@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:09:48 -0500
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, perc@ietf.org
Message-Id: <62C268C8-B361-4218-97F1-34FD0D4E4EE9@iii.ca>
References: <CABcZeBNKZLww=iFutD_EVGzNJo0y6ieSoZ55LjCG4rnnn-bOhw@mail.gmail.com> <9A3F5BE1-169D-43F0-85F6-BFEB0FBE4D62@mozilla.com>
To: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/tPlIkVAJFuRTVShZolvQjDUf9Vc>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Double questions
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:09:55 -0000

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
>> So, does that mean that the original PT/SEQ (as reconstructed from
>> OHB) are not used for anything other than to make the decryption work?
>> They're totally discarded?
> 
> That is my understanding, yes.

Pretty much .. but they might get used for various stats at e2e level

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email