[Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-perc-double-10: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 May 2019 01:46 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: perc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949C6120183; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-perc-double@ietf.org, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, perc-chairs@ietf.org, suhasietf@gmail.com, perc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.96.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <155797119959.30479.12029043973091130444.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:46:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/v3XbZ8-KgL4vgGHuvI7QkRY-Xh8>
Subject: [Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-perc-double-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 01:46:40 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-perc-double-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-perc-double/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this draft. A few comments: (1) Section 5.1. Step 5. Is the “protected RTP packet” the same as the “synthetic” RTP packet? If so, I recommend using consistent language. (2) Section 5.1. Step 5. Recommend making this text, “append an empty OHB (0x00) to the encrypted payload (with the authentication tag)”, more explicit in stating that concatenation of bytes is encrypted payload + authentication tag + OHB. (3) Editorial: ** Section 5.2. Typo. s/the the/the/ ** Please review the editorial comments in the SECDIR review https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-perc-double-10-secdir-lc-perlman-2018-10-31/
- [Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker