IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Updated info for perpass lunch mtg

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Mon, 17 February 2014 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002E61A0239 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:04:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3of58vUKEnMu for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp01.mail2web.com (xsmtp01.mail2web.com [168.144.250.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B061A01DB for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.5.2.15] (helo=xmail05.myhosting.com) by xsmtp01.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1WFTRm-0000Vg-GC for perpass@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:04:01 -0500
Received: (qmail 14363 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2014 19:01:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO HUITEMA5) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[131.107.147.54]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail05.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <doriavr@gmail.com>; 17 Feb 2014 19:01:40 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: 'Avri Doria' <doriavr@gmail.com>, perpass@ietf.org
References: <530229FF.80206@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <530229FF.80206@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:01:39 -0800
Message-ID: <01f401cf2c12$b11dd6f0$135984d0$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQItvn4WwlGpBP97v6xRSU8dRoxwjpn8pjqA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/G4h2TW2tG8Ng472vEvDIvvMjTN4
Subject: Re: [perpass] Updated info for perpass lunch mtg
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:04:07 -0000

> * http://huitema.net/papers/draft-huitema-perpass-dhcp-identifiers-00.txt

Just a quick note about this draft. During previous perpass discussions, I
mentioned the need to go back to old standards and review them. Typical
reason for the review is that post-Snowden, our estimate of proper tradeoff
between ease of management and privacy changes. The review of DHCP here is
typical. 

Of course, I missed the submission window by a whole week, so I don't really
expect the draft to be reviewed during the next IETF. Besides, I cannot join
you in London. But regardless of the actual content, you may use it as an
example of what "reviewing old RFC" could mean.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email