Re: [perpass] Planning to attend perpass lunch mtg on reviews on 3 March 2014?

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D296D1A0216 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1tTFI89X8tp for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673291A01FC for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp18so19429835obc.36 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=K6o33956Y4bAPOJa7pZstBEvEV5tq+0VvlCycWl5h4E=; b=ylDCmGLEGDM9YEG+bk9q9eeHXXxjHghdijcjFzrbczRXnNFl/vVPXqgsUxMVWF1+Z5 ppvvSIjXBxamVw10PGrTDSGSlqFxlF/qnSfbOm0FEmW5WOPh5lBxP9DxmCExrV3CyJ4F YJvyVIiWtcStuicG8W6sBASUsWVH5ettrHvv7DSWumbzuRyfIMZ8ALLHz5853S4DVQVd 4C78jZ28r7FaWCBWaYvZfJNCAYvmZL5QERzoqn26NghpwUxiugIuap0HnPk5RTAoIpKG C8wIiH3sBxHcgX7wN58MiAiDJeUyozCv48tuoeuC5M4ibdoJFesb2dKeiAtTHG0/FytY 1dCQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.19.132 with SMTP id f4mr28381920obe.14.1392771443296; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:57:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5304007F.6040408@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <53033E51.90500@acm.org> <5303F97D.2010506@gmail.com> <5304007F.6040408@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:57:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP8wsQig7E0mCNDPPQK=QW8z79qtvWuHKCvprq466Wp69Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/Gk0mFD7XhKmkM_0MXCn1jzfLnHI
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Planning to attend perpass lunch mtg on reviews on 3 March 2014?
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:57:28 -0000

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> 2) As a Gen-ART reviewer, I'm wondering whether Gen-ART
>> should add it to our (virtual) checklist of issues, or
>> can we leave it entirely to the security review.
>
> I'd love to see both teams tackle this topic if possible.
> More coverage is just better.

Yes I think gen-art should consider privacy issues of all sorts.  It's
already on my personal checklist.

Scott