[perpass] UTA: Proposed list of deliverables
"Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com> Sat, 18 January 2014 06:32 UTC
Return-Path: <oritl@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0340F1ADEB7 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:32:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4Pzla5cUdOi for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:32:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0157.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.157]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83E11ADE72 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.139.24) by BY2PR03MB299.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.139.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.851.11; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:31:58 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.139.24]) by BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.139.24]) with mapi id 15.00.0851.011; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:31:58 +0000
From: "Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com>
To: "perpass@ietf.org" <perpass@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Proposed list of deliverables
Thread-Index: Ac8UFmYji/VA3VmEQGKaaXEQ6c6LRQ==
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:31:57 +0000
Message-ID: <06cc9b13e6024b39b619c6a26710f4f4@BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [98.247.123.117]
x-forefront-prvs: 0095BCF226
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(679001)(779001)(689001)(13464003)(199002)(189002)(164054003)(377454003)(69234005)(31966008)(93136001)(92566001)(74502001)(93516002)(74662001)(47446002)(76176001)(56776001)(79102001)(81542001)(77982001)(59766001)(81342001)(76786001)(76796001)(76576001)(66066001)(65816001)(80022001)(54316002)(74316001)(74876001)(74706001)(63696002)(69226001)(74366001)(49866001)(47736001)(85852003)(51856001)(81686001)(53806001)(47976001)(83072002)(50986001)(4396001)(33646001)(46102001)(87266001)(87936001)(15975445006)(80976001)(2656002)(56816005)(81816001)(90146001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(83322001)(54356001)(76482001)(85306002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB299; H:BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:98.247.123.117; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Subject: [perpass] UTA: Proposed list of deliverables
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:32:15 -0000
FYI and let's keep this thread on the UTA list. Thanks, Orit. -----Original Message----- From: Uta [mailto:uta-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Orit Levin (LCA) Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 10:25 PM To: uta@ietf.org Cc: Pete Resnick; Barry Leiba Subject: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables Below is the list of deliverables for your consideration: 1. A threat analysis document containing a collection of known security breaches to application protocols due to poor use of TLS (Likely an Informational RFC) 2. Applications' independent document recommending best existing and future practices for using TLS (Likely a BCP or a Proposed Standard RFC) 3. A set of documents, each describing best existing and future practices for using TLS with a specific application protocol, i.e., SMTP, POP, IMAP, XMPP, HTTP 1.1, etc. (Case-by-case likely a BCP or a Proposed Standard RFC) 4. A document discussing (and potentially defining) how to apply the opportunistic encryption approach (preliminary outlined in draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt) to TLS. (Category TBD) Please, send your feedback to the list (including short +1s to indicate that the direction makes sense to you). Thanks, Leif and Orit - the chairs. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
- [perpass] UTA: Proposed list of deliverables Orit Levin (LCA)