Re: comments on draft-ietf-pilc-link-arq-issues-01.txt

Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 19 March 2001 15:05 UTC

Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:05:42 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
X-Sender: eep1lw@regan.ee.surrey.ac.uk
Reply-To: L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk
To: Gary Kenward <gkenward@nortelnetworks.com>
cc: pilc@grc.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-pilc-link-arq-issues-01.txt
In-Reply-To: <13E2EF604DE5D111B2E50000F80824E8057A8DF8@zwdld001.ca.nortel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0103191501520.13792-100000@regan.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
Organization: speaking for none
X-url: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/
X-no-archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Scanner: exiscan *14f1E6-00008a-00*HVbcZ5oIexw*
Sender: owner-pilc@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 902
Lines: 28

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Gary Kenward wrote:

> Hello. Gorry Fairhurst asked me if I had any comments on the latest version
> of ARQ draft, and suggested that I post them directly to the list.
> 
> I have been preoccupied elsewhere lately, so this is a bit of a
> rushed review.  Hopefully, my comments will be of help to the
> draft editors and the PILC working group.

Yes - very much so. thanks.

(Since the IETF meet's currently underway in Minneapolis, Gorry and I
can't easily discuss/respond to/act on your detailed comments
immediately. He's there, I'm not.)

thanks,

L.

> First of all, given the complexity of ARQ/MAC protocols, the draft does a
> really good job of covering many issues. 
> 
> (Below, I use the notation "pg#" for "page #", "s#.#" for "section #.#",
> "p#" for "paragraph #" and "pt#" for "point #")
[..]

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

comments on draft-ietf-pilc-link-arq-issues-01.txt Gary Kenward
Re: comments on draft-ietf-pilc-link-arq-issues-0… Lloyd Wood