Re: Protocol Action: Advice to link designers on link Automatic Repeat reQues (ARQ) to BCP
Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk> Fri, 05 April 2002 22:12 UTC
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:12:05 +0100
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: eep1lw@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk
Reply-To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
To: PILC mailing list <pilc@grc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: Advice to link designers on link Automatic Repeat reQues (ARQ) to BCP
In-Reply-To: <200204052147.QAA19841@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0204052305450.5049-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
Organization: speaking for none
X-url: http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/
X-no-archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Scanner: exiscan *16tbwG-0007eo-00*kQn4QwyjXnM* (SECM, UniS)
Sender: owner-pilc@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 598
Lines: 21
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Advice to link designers on > link Automatic Repeat reQues (ARQ)' > <draft-ietf-pilc-link-arq-issues-04.txt> as a BCP. I don't know why the lack of a t on 'Request' just won't die... it's (not) been there ever since we changed the name at -02. neat way of spotting automation, I suppose. > Protocol Quality > > The document received extensive reviews on its specifics about ARQ > techniques on the PILC WG mailing list. thanks, all. L. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>