RE: "Long Thin Networks Internet-Draft" submitted for PILC B
"Spencer Dawkins" <Spencer.Dawkins.sdawkins@nt.com> Mon, 23 November 1998 23:18 UTC
X-Authentication-Warning: assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-pilc@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-ID: <21DA0C60907AD21198570000F80930C1FFFA@zrchb214.us.nortel.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <Spencer.Dawkins.sdawkins@nt.com>
To: pilc@lerc.nasa.gov
Subject: RE: "Long Thin Networks Internet-Draft" submitted for PILC B
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:18:04 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-pilc@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2280
Lines: 57
Aaron, this isn't a definitive delta, but it's close... The biggest delta isn't actually that much of a change - we moved our recommendations section into the previous section of the paper, proposal by proposal. This matches more closely the approach taken by TCPSAT, which I like. This was the list of work items that Gab and I were using for coordination (and if it doesn't say DONE, it's probably a next-time activity). In addition, we also added a section on sharing TCP control blocks (4.13). And we probably did a few other minor items. - in recommendations section (5) need to beef up: o Improved Scheduling Algorithms on End Systems (was CBQ section) o spell out issues with delayed dupacks o why is ipsec a problem for ecn but not for snoop? - DONE (although I think the section for snoop was already explicit enough) - need references for cdpd and gsm/gprs - DONE - check for changes in "stability of the proposal" in the table, as some stuff may already be rfc (e.g., header compression/ payload compression..) DONE - but I thought IPPCP was approved as PS, and it's still showing up as IDs on the WG home page... - add more verbage on why van jacobson compression is bad for us, and why degermark et al have a better alternative, and recommend using it - DONE - add verbage mentioned by hari about ack-every-segment being bad for asymmetric networks, cuz it effectively limits the forward bandwidth - DONE - add pointer and ref to scps (mentioned by travis) http://www.scps.org/scps - fetch refs in badri's protocol adaptation paper - add section on M-TCP (not MTCP) - add section on Amigos - add verbage on disconnections and burst errors/handoffs - draft-ietf-tcpsat-*.txt - standard mechanisms DONE, research DONE - draft-kksjf-ecn-*.txt - DONE - draft-rfced-info-partridge-*.txt - DONE - rfc 2414 (was draft-floyd-incr-init-win-*.txt) - DONE - rfc 2415 (was draft-ietf-tcpimpl-poduri-*.txt) - DONE, - rfc 2416 (was draft-shepard-tcp-4-packets-3-buff-*.txt) - DONE - draft-ietf-tcpimpl-prob-*.txt - DONE but not included - draft-ietf-tcpimpl-cong-control-*.txt replaces rfc2000, stevens - DONE - modify considerations (e.g. on snoop) based on nitin's simulations