Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-drlb-13
"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Sun, 15 December 2019 12:46 UTC
Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C15B1200C4; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 04:46:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=GQH2KgD3; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=sE/MC3hO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CyWaJb8gqZs; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 04:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76A2120033; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 04:46:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1576413993; x=1577623593; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WgBePMOM+2zKuvEuCBhXtEAJgXQDnpATsIa2hWJhRBA=; b=GQH2KgD3aKbbmK2H5W9W1D80PuFMAa+pxk1TYp6aLXlBgZLvg54MvvOY QetggNUqr5BeTHo53TYrvtE6la9DXt9x/eZ5bWU5pXVp6AxPCtVRvrPiQ w/EWZ3xv1PyDgCPWvLgWmBIjyPONHHo9f8AhCmBv03+oKUI2yH9lelSVK c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:RNCyUhB8ggpPSV5GBQj+UyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs13kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHwQAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuLvXuZjY5EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CoBQDuKfZd/5JdJa1lHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgX6BS1AFbFggBAsqCoN6g0YDiw2COiWYBoJSA1QJAQEBDAEBGAsKAgEBhEACF4F4JDgTAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFXgEBAQECAQEBEBERDAEBLAsBBAsCAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEDgUigwABgkYDDiABDqFdAoE4iGF1gTKCfgEBBYULGIIXAwaBDiiMGBqBQT+BOAwUgh4uPoJkAQGBY3eCGTKCLJAznV9sCoI0kWSEIRuCQ4w3i06pFQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVOyoBgkFQERSNEgwXg1CFFIU/dIEojgsBgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,317,1571702400"; d="scan'208";a="680981570"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Dec 2019 12:46:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xBFCkWLK016752 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:46:32 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:46:31 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 07:46:31 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:46:30 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LjpkJ4JvkqlDNByeg6vLzZto1kqyep0S+X+yebdSOG+e9CxVxEnc9h40/Sc4bAHSZMkeN+Uu2YbGSvNLn6lD5exed0uyR7vZfoyt+Qu8Qo6xFOUoKPSxEk1sGyqrW46AYbV+V5XC7wiShpmEo4sh5kN3ER0Ll/knexFj/YPsyU6PGSTKmgpzBMd7feZZEy6sdEXBzaSX98JFmD57J/MPTeJ2Y1Iyqi7Wd67w/TnWA3jaQEbwIKs6XOPBAls5ByIQMosxReK2/pYrwJUzXul9nJaGabv6GRth/2rGP+kRJ+fxTmoBCaHn2e3nDG4qqXdcvybNcgEtmebpkw6D1cFLaQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WgBePMOM+2zKuvEuCBhXtEAJgXQDnpATsIa2hWJhRBA=; b=l4cFEwdS7xI3nS9Q3RQv1/AibqPU2ZTP38KOc+2nW6J6j7r2N9mDqGdaHV3j5obtPcha1DHDW0rK+4lZ4l4/Us6NoMyqs4mwp90yeaDai0wCWLHLYbOVF8Ua/4UfGAw9VLCoq4hI12GObFGVbhVwt+pn9Ae3Hfqw52XQNg0vEDtE+FifI7UlaYieWI0rgbOglVoP2a2LBZMIDnDwkXSnoUygRPPvGj1oxh+p9ynwo0gZVIHNkjlC7PQZDXD3KbQ2mn4LAgGqwx97MCfxEwjUXRkjh67kNuZOAOJDJuNv7WTe//WFusC3hMRoi27Nas9LoEpH6nQ4dGDrdbbJweEktA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WgBePMOM+2zKuvEuCBhXtEAJgXQDnpATsIa2hWJhRBA=; b=sE/MC3hOkremuex0lb9omzaQIBDRx0cs1PYroqJVKa1/cj6L3Nvm4SUHVqjYMmgP/j0hIShCCShoICYj4wG0WKNb4rk1fgt7AkQpKK+tISXZ6Frt2zhYWxITb6E3WXkNWlIOhG6l22ELzl5oFFI9s0df1xkHbOSBTXu2PO/B0p0=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.23.12) by BN6PR11MB4131.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.130.167) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2538.18; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:46:30 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7c70:b7fd:340e:ad7a]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7c70:b7fd:340e:ad7a%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2538.019; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:46:30 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
CC: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-drlb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-drlb.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-drlb-13
Thread-Index: AQHVsHbnaDd1a1So5UepydBVHg2IZqe7KmuA
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:46:30 +0000
Message-ID: <86D9EBEC-5544-4D03-9714-2FE5C6FC16CE@cisco.com>
References: <157246378456.32588.13080368226769629725@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHANBtLJyhP896gRw4mo5V=HEtYqC+633GmRHK_Ps8nONKsHmw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtLJyhP896gRw4mo5V=HEtYqC+633GmRHK_Ps8nONKsHmw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jclarke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [64.103.25.43]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5182fd29-7e42-4f93-d906-08d7815ccec2
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB4131:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB4131BB9B70A10480CF0B7F9AB8560@BN6PR11MB4131.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5797;
x-forefront-prvs: 02524402D6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(5660300002)(66476007)(53546011)(66946007)(66556008)(6916009)(66574012)(6486002)(478600001)(6506007)(64756008)(36756003)(186003)(26005)(966005)(8936002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(316002)(86362001)(76116006)(66446008)(2616005)(91956017)(33656002)(54906003)(2906002)(6512007)(71200400001)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR11MB4131; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: f+A6Kigne4uGyjEj/IkmmIfbngn/hUgW/7F7ONIU1/o9uO3WPkhA+6BZG1JjkWpxiL15Hu4N4POg7TQ5t1+L8wwDmcLsPSRL/sEe5VeIPA9AbQ9HTXw+66IT/XtyYeSVhonMwHauZBIutigEk66E2R6Zhg3NwROideFlHoX6mdEp2uQZgpIA8fj+5D03jd4h42HPP/O2fl4EvrC9b3B2p432T7m6Cwq5yO8yiLdpR1uXZdACO9cTJycpxJERof+EV9Rd8tkHzFUUIGCGq5XE6dSo2RCCt1oprQujsL9QdUAWEYf74+OBvtyjDA4aVL9qJAU6E//4fLnBZFuUMSp4G38BpxLAFU7lE59ksPC2cZeHXRqjNGDETkBdO+mwQQ2REcbm22yg4JjRyG77JWm4utylAUwd5EVkvlFs38zUkmyZFhRG7KEC7/PEm7h2EGcqH3rAcaTA0iXZixeOy7RRXFy6CK85W9QZrh4pDjyAVg4=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <51FDDD7B51CD094B9DB69C7A2F79CE77@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5182fd29-7e42-4f93-d906-08d7815ccec2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Dec 2019 12:46:30.0615 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yDqo/orMt9Ww4JmAPSySkE+TfHb+yrygRrCgygxoSR8zHLuatR7iH9EViIuXnCvwV4iNgWhTLpexeoBzfihQGg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB4131
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/5pBSaq8Ci2KkNGOC_6bejdrHC7E>
Subject: Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-drlb-13
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:46:37 -0000
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 18:00, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for your review. I addressed the nits in the latest version. I > could maybe have added the callout you suggested, but I omitted that. > I hope vendors/implementors will provide it though. Thanks, Stig. I wouldn’t be so optimistic of vendors ;-). Speaking as someone that did support for many years, having some documentation to make troubleshooting more deterministic would be appreciated. Joe > > Stig > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:30 PM Joe Clarke via Datatracker > <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Joe Clarke >> Review result: Ready >> >> I was asked to review this document on behalf of the ops directorate. This >> document describes a new protocol to do PIM DR load balancing. In general, I >> think this document is ready. I appreciate both the backwards compat and >> operator considerations sections. In fact, as I read through this, I kept >> thinking, "I hope they talk about legacy vs. new routers on the same shared >> LAN". One thing that might be good to add is a callout to vendors/implementors >> that they are explicit in which GDR for which group/source. Thinking with a >> troubleshooting mind, this changes the paradigm in forwarding and knowing how >> that behaves will be critical. >> >> I also found three really small nits: >> >> Section 5.2.1: >> >> s/ordinal number of router X/ordinal number of Router X/ >> >> === >> >> Section 5.4: >> >> s/permissable/permissible/ >> >> === >> >> Section 5.8: >> >> s/take part in an load-balancing/take part in load-balancing/ >> >> -- >> last-call mailing list >> last-call@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
- [pim] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-d… Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of … Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of … Joe Clarke (jclarke)