RE: [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM
"David McWalter" <DMcW@dataconnection.com> Fri, 03 March 2006 18:15 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFEoX-0000Sc-OA; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:15:41 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFEoW-0000P2-11 for pim@iesg.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:15:40 -0500
Received: from smtp.dataconnection.com ([192.91.191.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFEoT-0007Ub-IS for pim@iesg.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:15:40 -0500
Received: from enfimail2.datcon.co.uk ([172.19.14.250]) by smtp.dataconnection.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:15:36 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: RE: [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:15:35 -0000
Message-ID: <8AC1AD08D396174DBC4E6D44EFACCFB146451B@enfimail2.datcon.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM
Thread-Index: AcY+7ah5i9Royr7LQii9PNR647ssSAAACwew
From: David McWalter <DMcW@dataconnection.com>
To: Pramendra Singh <Pramendra.Singh@lntinfotech.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2006 18:15:36.0069 (UTC) FILETIME=[77DC1B50:01C63EEE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc: pim@iesg.org
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0688711358=="
Errors-To: pim-bounces@ietf.org
Dear Pramendra, draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-11.txt is the current version. You are correct that the draft text says that it has expired. However, if you check PIM WG draft status on the IETF website, you can see this document is still Active, and is currently undergoing IESG evaluation for publication as an RFC. https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=show_wg_id <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=show_wg_id&id=1397> &id=1397 Best regards, Dave McW. -----Original Message----- From: Pramendra Singh [mailto:Pramendra.Singh@lntinfotech.com] Sent: 03 March 2006 06:53 To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM Dear Sir/ Madam, I am reffering draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-11.txt by (Bill Fenner/AT&T,Mark Handley/UCL, Hugh Holbrook/Cisco, Isidor Kouvelas/Cisco) which expired on April 2005 for Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM). Can you please let me know which latest draft or RFC should I refer for this? Thanks and Regards Pramendra Singh Larsen and Toubro Infotech Limited, Bangalore –560001 Contact No : 080-25323734/5/6 Extn :310 ______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
- [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM Pramendra Singh
- RE: [pim] Query Regarding PIM-SM David McWalter