RE: [pim] PIM Hello Messages
"David McWalter" <DMcW@dataconnection.com> Wed, 01 February 2006 12:37 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F4HEk-0004ey-7l; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:37:26 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F4HEf-0004cx-Tx for pim@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:37:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14577 for <pim@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:35:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp.dataconnection.com ([192.91.191.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4HPp-000377-W2 for pim@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:48:54 -0500
Received: from enfimail1.datcon.co.uk ([172.19.14.253]) by smtp.dataconnection.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:37:02 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: RE: [pim] PIM Hello Messages
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:37:02 -0000
Message-ID: <986E07666EAE1C459DC81492A7FA4CEA0F19B5@enfimail1.datcon.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pim] PIM Hello Messages
Thread-Index: AcYnJ5RIqwi90/WQROKNQYaitqYEYgAA3AAw
From: David McWalter <DMcW@dataconnection.com>
To: Nikhil Ninan <nikhil@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2006 12:37:02.0840 (UTC) FILETIME=[33D6D780:01C6272C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2bf730a014b318fd3efd65b39b48818c
Cc: pim@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0513188435=="
Sender: pim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pim-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Nikhil. A PIM router waits longer than the hello_period before removing its adjacency with a neighbor. - Periodic Hellos are sent every hello_period seconds (30s by default). - Adjacencies are removed when the neighbor liveness timer expires (105s by default). See sections 4.3.1, 4.3.2 and 4.11 of the PIM spec for details. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-11.txt Hope that's helpful. DMcW. -----Original Message----- From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Nikhil Ninan Sent: 01 February 2006 12:04 To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] PIM Hello Messages Importance: High Hello, I have a query on PIM Hello Messages: If a PIM router does not receive a Hello Message from one of its neighbors within the "hello_period" will it drop the router's address from its list of neighbors or will it wait for the router to miss a few more "hello_period" 's before it completely removes the router from the list. Any feedback on this would be very useful. Cheers Nikhil
_______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
- [pim] PIM Hello Messages Nikhil Ninan
- RE: [pim] PIM Hello Messages David McWalter