Re: [pim] agenda requests for Montreal

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Mon, 02 July 2018 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAAA1311BD for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5LD1yOUCJTh for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4754B13118A for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1094158C4BB; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id EE99F4401A4; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:54:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 23:54:32 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180702215432.5uqebchak5xvtuk4@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/MEI58TAv_7M_tXFOUFxlJ8NHNqA>
Subject: Re: [pim] agenda requests for Montreal
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:54:40 -0000

WOuld like to ask for a "new new draft currently" to discuss
interest and process to evolve standards status of IGMP/MLD

   a)  downgrade IGMPv1/IGMPv2/MLDv1 to something worse than IGMPv3/MLDv2/IGMP-MLD-lite
      - goal is to do everything we can do to discourage utilization of old protocols
        in new products.

   b) Raising standards track level of IGMPv3/MLDv2/IGMP-MLD-lite

   c) documenting/mitigating ? Risk in deployments upgrading.


I for once have really no clue on what the process for a), b) is and what
our options are, so i hope we'll have a friendly AD or more senior IETF
pprocess aware folks who could help figuring ou the best option quickly.

Wrt to c): After raising a) on the list i talkd to a customer who was
worried about a) happening because of i think a range of issues: 

  a) misunderstanding how IGMPv3/MLDv2 are fully backward compatible
     with IGMPv2 / MLDv1 functionality and also fully support ASM.

  b) In any text we may produce about downgrading older IGMP/MLD<
     it needs to be very clear that this implies NO change to the
     status of ASM (and the separate work we are doing to change the status
     of ASM will only downgrade interdomain ASM).
     
  c) In the specific deplyment, intradomain ASM is used wih Bidir-PIM,
     and to the best of my knowledge, the interaction between Bidir-PIM and
     IGMPv3/MLDv2 is not well specified, but IMHO its also not really well
     specified for PIM-SM. 

Let me know. 10 mins or so ?
     
Cheers
    Toerless

(*): If you prefer me to have slides highlighting 


In-Reply-To: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CBEC069@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:13:48PM +0000, Michael McBride wrote:
> If you haven't yet requested time to present in Montreal please do so. We are meeting back to back, same room, with mboned but not sharing the same timeslot since we were way to rushed last time. Grab a cookie then come to pim. Here are the time slots:
> 
> TUESDAY, July 17, 2018
> 
> 1330-1530  Afternoon Session I
> Notre Dame      	OPS 	mboned      	MBONE Deployment WG
> 
> 1530-1550  Beverage and Snack Break - Convention Floor Foyer
> 
> 1550-1820  Afternoon Session II
> Notre Dame      	RTG 	pim         	Protocols for IP Multicast WG
> 
> We will send an agenda out in another week.
> 
> Thanks,
> mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de