IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] agenda for IETF101

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> Tue, 13 March 2018 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500F9127867 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s12ge1rxdAVu for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22c.google.com (mail-pl0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51857124E15 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 61-v6so10541610plf.3 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5wXWTC+k/qFrHRFhGjsSq2EFOlmpe9AjnBy4FQuxjvg=; b=mnDXua2hl3di84aww8Jmy4LecITbFQnZLdQnSJ8kzHwBLjj4IU5l2f6SkCnKEmTbNQ d4HDT5wWzIQVgGwq031G7SmX6PSqyX/39nRSAKYrAvyws6vS5S6pCF8bxhb5CTzwkquW wdP2eDheFV3dTMaaSnIP9YSt5IKkJurKjmmacwIFcQhBBpXaoTVb5BXoz/LLCvLkmZKb IT9lfh/aMs0ZRANXYL8Q7qbO4jo8xs6x2GtIPns/QTwNQniCwGkve67amO96KMAx7Zki HJ/AjsxQ28z+4bw7g9pdB8BC0blo6j5l+nFMokUaLJjwGJ0kWtWdt47kuBYeaVVuzyRD wrkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5wXWTC+k/qFrHRFhGjsSq2EFOlmpe9AjnBy4FQuxjvg=; b=JfQOvJFxIU9ben0x/YeTrQeO/PRzsdffJNyrCkKaEqOdDxCUUYYPOfJqjm6ibUk+na dtnYovtqGZx0TbnjOScYT/fCbT9xI53cb1R0g6tp6aZAcM7ovpCtX89FW4Ig4tqpxbOC Rej6BUs8rr/+yoqO48ntKvFLR3NpxUF40C4yVX+RPAKuyNLhDwSB3znAtZe/sqWpkXIy ycWpCWKq5V2xQ+UhN8++hWoKgBtjJ9covWJUQxEghgGDo51HslN52aKkdLn1wNZBvhJS FNT6DscqdQyMbHdo7IufQ4BDEVRoJrFWmnZ+asfAgOB0UqkYojxAN0hyBlFMQUhXW0b9 YxlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Gj592IliZ1/3RCqPhShqq9PLHX8mkHS/kFxW2ASFpw0bEGXv0E vzfa/4O0h2o5nMAdZSn0kpthsA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsQuQn3LJpQc1KE7u+YTUeA6d+Ux+Y00rS6G7D26tKLM/GYdDtuh3q4peV5pgD0VOqZovHo1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9885:: with SMTP id s5-v6mr10455961plp.400.1520909938824; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:200:e103:1000:98e4:c0d4:2078:d05f? ([2001:200:e103:1000:98e4:c0d4:2078:d05f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c21sm17528669pfi.91.2018.03.12.19.58.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CA50CF4@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:58:55 +0900
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB922050-6BE7-4710-803D-F6541B2A24CE@ieee.org>
References: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CA50CF4@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
To: Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/SZuj5eKzPfV2EstV44YkiXPeVk0>
Subject: Re: [pim] agenda for IETF101
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 02:59:02 -0000

Hi folks,

Since I cannot attend the upcoming IETF meeting, I’d like to inform the state of the
IGMP/MLD explicit tracking draft.

The draft update has been gotten stuck for more than a year. I’m sorry about that.
One of the biggest issues is that according to AD’s comments we recognized we need
to include more experimental inputs in the document as its intended status is
experimental draft, while we had initially worked drafting the document as the standard
document.

I got a few response from vendors who could work for the draft update while the update
was just delayed.

I hope the draft update would be done before the next IETF, but if some of you who have
experiments of their explicit tracking functions/implementations can contribute to the draft
improvement/update, please contact me.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Best regards,

Hitoshi



> 2018/03/08 10:07, Michael McBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Please let us know if we missed any requests for London. The agenda has been posted and here is what we have so far:
>  
> WG Status                                    Stig/Mike
> MANET mfib work                             Justin Dean
> draft-meng-pim-sm-enhancement-01            Zhe Chen
> draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case          Greg Mirsky
> draft-venaas-pim-reserved-bits-00           Stig
> draft-xie-pim-bier-extension                Jingrong
> draft-ramki-pim-null-register-packing-00    Mankamana
> draft-anish-reliable-pim-registers          Toerless
>  
> We have a particularly busy agenda this time so Stig and I might simply provide a quick status of the existing wg drafts to allow time for the request for discussion from MANET and all the new work. We are meeting jointly with mboned again but next time we may need our own slot if this keeps up.
>  
> Thanks,
> mike
>  
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email