Re: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Mon, 16 March 2015 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1041A9050 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOUQJH44ry2h for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08AC41A1B78 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BTS19204; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:54:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:54:05 +0000
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml702-chm ([10.193.5.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:53:58 -0700
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: saeed sami <sami.biz.email@gmail.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQXRiOQZ5P4XiuqUafnbzLa0OF+J0fif+g
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:53:58 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D5714E26F@dfweml701-chm>
References: <mailman.181.1425585634.2683.pim@ietf.org> <55021ADD.8050302@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55021ADD.8050302@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.148.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/UE_nyaMYwU7QIAPN8HAQkl8krk4>
Subject: Re: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:54:10 -0000
Hi Saeed, Thank you for your encourage feedback. Yes, PIM WG should work on new ideas that fit new market requirements. Hope we will work together on IGP multicast. Thanks, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: pim [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of saeed sami Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 6:02 PM To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt Hi. After reading the draft i must say that the idea and the procedures explained in it are well formed and mature to begin the work on this kind of routing protocols and it will be a good step for the WG to work on new ideas like this. having a Routing protocol capable of handling both unicast and multicast will make administration a lot easier and will be beneficial. but it will need the WG to become ready for new ideas and unfortunately everything has beed focused on PIM-SM RFC4601 - bis4601 atleast in the past 12 months and it seems that no one is interested in new ideas which might improve multicast routing if guided in the right direction. I hope draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00 gets noticed and WG shows some interest to work on it or other new drafts like draft-sami-pim-ng. On 03/05/2015 11:30 ب.ظ, pim-request@ietf.org wrote: > New Version Notification for > draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim