IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Paris agenda

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F1121E804E for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqWFfgqhtWLz for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:45:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E721E8059 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:45:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.33.12.84] (128-107-239-233.cisco.com [128.107.239.233]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 728A27FED; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:45:07 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F555001.4050508@venaas.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:45:05 -0800
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
References: <CAL3FGfxUQuG-rB3_q8_FFSKR=v+-MWmSvpgMUFsg7-Qp3D0ymw@mail.gmail.com> <4F554ECB.2080604@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F554ECB.2080604@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pim] Paris agenda
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:45:09 -0000

On 3/5/2012 3:39 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Could we add draft-taylor-draft-taylor-pim-v4v6-translation-00.txt,
> Right now I find it a little mind-stretching to imagine the interaction
> of IPv4 and IPv6 PIM routers on a single link with a dual-stack PIM
> router on the same link, and I'm sure to come across some interesting
> issue updating the document this week.

At least generally, the IPv4 and IPv6 PIM functions are completely
separate. Dual-stack would normally not change anything.

If you consider a PIM router doing translation where say downstream
joins for an IPv6 group should be turned into an IPv4 join upstream,
then the upstream state-machine would be exactly like a normal IPv4 PIM
router. The only difference is how the state got created.

Stig

> On 05/03/2012 5:17 PM, Mike McBride wrote:
>> PIM is scheduled to meet 1300-1500 on Tuesday March 27th. Here is our
>> agenda as of today:
>>
>> draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking
>> draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis
>> draft-hou-pim-drlb
>> draft-perreault-mboned-igmp-mld-translation
>> draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu
>>
>> Please let Stig and I know if you would like an agenda slot.
>>
>> thanks,
>> mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> pim mailing list
>> pim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email