[pim] Use-cases for draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
Ashutosh Gupta <ashutoshgupta.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ashutoshgupta.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA412D85E for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:04:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqwBzSnHy1Fi for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B179112D860 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k6so232081ita.3 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:04:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g6PHlyHJqKVcYNvB1k9Gmf3h9+pqgxAFF7fiYV0ERZw=; b=gqLw5fKu24YUdiLX3u4JucMXLFAiQxtFjg2lqxjl0dEt0LX0RQF1hgXUFTiBfDfqt+ DPHtcN/BsoesEh2YVQPfFZtdVDsO1x1KNDMWPWpkR6e/2r3SbIMma61G8HR/vzBf214r 4Q6PWgVATelfExe5Mea8v+n7pxbmjj2n5vZ95WEQN2+ogMdpN/M60BLWR8fppd0kWYbf mhStjHOU9KzNFpeFd6KMMZyfQ64swxQulok/hii+qw9hJlv4LDFJhSE/cLoAPWWnwuqw 3VK6WytS9MT4Li2F44a2ngrERlSSaa5VPhDMAgru2v+CCFvSbXnomHDnGGSw+//tyeJv ATWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g6PHlyHJqKVcYNvB1k9Gmf3h9+pqgxAFF7fiYV0ERZw=; b=keBg+7ZaDdx5wBRDKY078EneYCo8+C+GXIrTgw+JpoiKkjFfC5P7CMMgaqK2rpFLUG MkIYRwZQK+Iqd08DIpgn166BFX3sKKVPaLWKFsEnRmjnEkh/f7EGgE5Ehck+pBIYsBOY PCgmgQEGtG0MnRQpqbGn0hsFqxDHU6ydn12JVGbc+Wu+x/Sgj7RbkSHZrWDQNZsZfTw1 CXmFj2z3atON5CmOqUNLSW7LlzfIgDofxHHBAeT71S0mAaY41s4O54awYmIurRpoapvz E1jodQIgcVPrUCyAuqQZri6Z6v/bBGxnQ4SBq+9U/jUG5d+SH/Wzf9/xUU802EqMUz1+ Fs+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDRj+IeLMhoN3DK1NBBn/EUQFDY/4ed1757BBeyCTYqyEZpjE1d StidECSsWaYm+aK6d/hBYox/1dlNkhN1oTJKh5Vumw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226QLCbp29mFrJ6cSVsum+927EQWmSBkrs5WHFeuuoV+3FNo8COKgwKbB/kf7dAt5tdkLdgNSUyal9u6RSiyUbM=
X-Received: by 10.36.73.217 with SMTP id e86mr500192itd.51.1517871890385; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:04:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.26.203 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:04:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Ashutosh Gupta <ashutoshgupta.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 23:04:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPAoC9RCV2jhKePaQE99tcDVF4Y0cGktZ+DPw+-WoW9eGPK-ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11448174d7511305647f1654"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/VN7A2dpgt3X3StIsA7Saej3Z0Uo>
Subject: [pim] Use-cases for draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 23:04:56 -0000
Hello PIMers, As you know, this draft outlines a use-case of including different AF neighbor in PIM hello's neighbor-list option when unicast routing is using BGP with RFC5549. Are there other use-cases you can think of ? (few members indicated possibility during the presentation of this draft in Chicago/Prague last year) Regards, Ashutosh
- [pim] Use-cases for draft-pim-with-ipv4-prefix-ov… Ashutosh Gupta