IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pim] PIM call for adoption of draft-eckert-pim-rfc1112bis

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 06 July 2023 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8E7C13AE2A; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qPbvmety3Z1; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA10C14CF18; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QxkkS3hGBznkT6; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 19:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4QxkkS366YzkwMX; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 19:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 19:57:04 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: pim@ietf.org
Cc: pim-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZKcAcCJDNUmjpUfT@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/WSaObYjFQ3iLRDA64P3kMxHZwgY>
Subject: [pim] PIM call for adoption of draft-eckert-pim-rfc1112bis
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 17:57:16 -0000

Dear PIM WG, Chairs

At IETF116 i presented this draft and think it received good WG interest, the
chairs suggestested we might want to do an adoption call before IETF117. So
hereby sending this email reminding of this draft.

Quick summary why ?

RFC1112bis IMHO would complete our IGMP/MLD update process, which othrerwise is
hopefully progrssing nicely with RFC3810bis, RFC3376bis and RFC3228bis going into
IETF/IESG review.

What is RFC1112bis - summary:

RFC1112 defines "IP Multicast (ASM)" service (for IPv4 only) - AND IGMPv1

We need to retire IGMPv1:
   RFC1112bis removes the IGMPv1 text.
   We can then make RFC1112 and hence IGMPv1 historic and therefore retire IGMPv1
   Because of RFC1112bis, this will not retire the ASM service model which is 
   then defined via RFC1112bis.

We want to declare IP Multicast (ASM) service to also apply to IPv6
   There is no other document currently doing all this.
   So RFC1112bis has all the changes to talk about IP and IPv6.

Thats pretty much the changes summary. Threre are details of course,

Hope we can get this also done in short time in the WG.

Thanks so much
    Toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email