RE: [pim] Comment on draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12.txt

"Mark Lewis" <mark@mjlnet.com> Tue, 18 July 2006 22:07 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xim-0006ue-29; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:07:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xik-0006uZ-6i for pim@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:07:14 -0400
Received: from omr2.networksolutionsemail.com ([205.178.146.52]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xii-0005Ml-T9 for pim@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:07:14 -0400
Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr2.mgt.netsol.com [10.49.6.65]) by omr2.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6IM7CNZ011503 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:07:12 -0400
Received: (qmail 6225 invoked by uid 78); 18 Jul 2006 22:07:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mark2wks) (80.225.200.34) by 10.49.36.65 with SMTP; 18 Jul 2006 22:07:11 -0000
From: Mark Lewis <mark@mjlnet.com>
To: John Zwiebel <jzwiebel@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [pim] Comment on draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12.txt
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:13:04 +0100
Message-ID: <PNEIJCHJDPGBIGJHLLLBCEIADEAA.mark@mjlnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <CFDD19CA-8E8B-44E7-8834-9762760610BC@cisco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Cc: pim@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mark@mjlnet.com
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pim-bounces@ietf.org

John,

> 
> 
> FWIW:
> Mark, I believe the draft is about to be published as an RFC so there
> won't be any changes.  You might write up a draft of your own on this  
> subject. :-)

Shucks, I've not been paying attention, and missed last call :)

Never mind.....

Cheers,

Mark


> 
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Mark Lewis wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just reading through draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12.txt (seems very  
> > good!), and I notice that while there is a section on 'Multi-access  
> > Transit LANs', there isn't a specific section on LANs to which  
> > recievers are attached. Might it be worth adding such a section?  
> > Perhaps it could cover the inter-relationship between PIM Assert  
> > process winner, PIM DR, and the IGMP querier (which router sends  
> > multicast traffic onto the LAN, which sends IGMPv1 queries, which  
> > sends IGMPv2 queries, etc)..
> >
> > I know that it is not the purpose of this spec to describe IGMP,  
> > but such a section might really help to clarify things.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pim mailing list
> > pim@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
> 

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim