[pim] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-14: (with DISCUSS)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-14: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Feel free to set me straight here if I'm wrong, but:

Section 2 says: "This section allocates a bit ..."

Doesn't this mean either (a) there should be a registry for these bits, and if
there is, there should be one or more corresponding IANA actions; or (b) this
document should update RFC 7761 so that the allocation of a previously reserved
bit is discoverable somehow?