[pim] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05: (with COMMENT)

"Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 21:22 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148045453268.11724.14479600594868851517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:22:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/fXdGx_gNNE7KrwFa-gZEP0p28TA>
Cc: mmcbride7@gmail.com, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [pim] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

For the values for the "transport" (and I do agree with Mirja that it
isn't entirely clear what should be there - I
was expecting different encapsulations), I'd recommend having 0 as being
unallocatable & having 255 be reserved for
future use as was suggested in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-code-point-reservation-bcp.

[pim] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-… Alia Atlas