IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pim] 答复: draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case call for adoption

<hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn> Tue, 25 September 2018 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EA01311D0 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zJLUXqBpAUY for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 344821310F6 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.215]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 84F789955D29D745A43E for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:20:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse02.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.21]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 7284A26A9ADAF1E0C11A; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:20:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from xgxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.30.14.22]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with SMTP id w8P3JuIc096082; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:19:56 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (xgxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid71; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:19:57 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:19:57 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af95ba9a95de4558cfd
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201809251119579402491@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CD6BD13@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: 8CCB28152EA2E14A96BBEDC15823481A1CD6BD13@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn
To: Michael.McBride@huawei.com
Cc: pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn w8P3JuIc096082
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/p02IlEPOiAwpNlsZMY3eyZJGIBw>
Subject: [pim] 答复: draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case call for adoption
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 03:20:45 -0000

Hi, all


This document proposes to use the p2mp BFD  for PIM-SM fast detection. IT improves the multicast service reliability.


I support to adopt it as workgroup draft.






Regards


Fangwei.






        








原始邮件



发件人：MichaelMcBride <Michael.McBride@huawei.com>
收件人：pim @ietf .org <pim @ietf .org>
日 期 ：2018年09月25日 03:20
主 题 ：[pim ] draft-mirsky-pim -bfd-p2mp-use-case call for adoption


_______________________________________________
pim  mailing list
pim@ietf .org
https://www.ietf .org/mailman/listinfo/pim 

  

Today begins a two week call for adoption of draft-mirsky-pim -bfd-p2mp-use-case-02


 


This draft has been presented in the last two ietf meetings along with discussions on the list. The draft has been updated with comments from those discussions. In Montreal, 2 people were in favor of adoption, none against. What say you?


 


https://datatracker.ietf .org/doc/draft-mirsky-pim -bfd-p2mp-use-case/


 


thanks,


mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email