IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pim] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 10 March 2022 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F198C3A17ED; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 06:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.061
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxrboeJjOAJF; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 06:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F653A17E5; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 06:55:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.120.176;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:55:29 -0500
Message-ID: <00f301d8348e$e2ae8c40$a80ba4c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F4_01D83464.F9D92080"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Adg0jgH6Vhd2qInSTIyLydPTNUZKHg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/r1ncmw70JXlv6DIwltsgzd6P-eA>
Subject: [pim] draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy (3/10 to 3/24/2022)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:55:49 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for: 

draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy from (3/10 to 3/24/2022) 

 

You can obtain the draft at: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hb-idr-sr-p2mp-policy/

 

In your comments for this call please consider: 

 

1)  Does this technology support the SR P2MP features 

that distributes candidate paths which connect 

a multicast distribution tree (tree to leaves). 

 

2) Is the technology correctly specified for the 

NLRI (AFI/SAFI) and the tunnel encapsulation attribute 

additions (sections 2 and 3)? 

 

3) Does the P2MP policy operation (section 4) 

provide enough information for those implementing this 

technology and those deploying the technology? 

 

4) Do you think this multicast technology is a good

Place to start for P2MP policy advertisement via BGP? 

 

5) Do you think this SR P2MP policies should not be advertised 

via BGP? 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email