Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-06

Alvaro Retana <> Thu, 19 December 2019 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B6E120A08; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:29:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W0WnQM0ifMjc; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2466912004E; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id r21so5857540edq.0; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8qnSlVDQz2+nvG9a3Xg3ktRvfomejy5eY0gR6OUJ14I=; b=DNW65HbVZuCI4j0MbwAsyucY6h0Tdz4GCM169YIfoYSxectxUlLnzxe4ii9cT5RsyL WxrggKePR0QLo6j2wDgxS5uuA+Zzm69+O+Zl2j1BqDhDAlVvD8uF931rd8rbCzpNIw+b kwthhOsoEnvXgEQ/Vl7D8oWoyIW2AEAlibBFAcXBQ6s5Y5Kf7FCt8HIxRbHEF/pJpXGo gBABumyNCwxhu1MGUXr1t7qP19wo2wWG5k/bN0RHy7F5IQdCQUyTuCEBXE0lfJ2mNpid 2I3c63gq3ULIuDH/Dw3HE9WcDhDtRUekFaTM/aup1LYjkO0CX4BBTNr8QNY+h8VJo2rR nDAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8qnSlVDQz2+nvG9a3Xg3ktRvfomejy5eY0gR6OUJ14I=; b=mUYXA8KJKz+IsxsLdmM/ptU8SXUogKvw7tf149BbufFz6e2LGmMlu5fyx9kRmSpxI6 kZIy5gC9pzLoDTVJOETGHUFUqEnUJc1xatisF6747GCGoauJEQ3UqBdPdXxE2Tl9CaZ+ LjXQAucEWmiJbOnLiGkmPZRQ71fYfFc/r0nTpltLpc30LyYRjJpC7I++TQTun8Ya0pM3 2EukA7d+rwE8EwFnl6FlesKkzvsUBXcK5kM4EzoWaqt0jSS9rnD8t4bP2MwdpGco0vCG iUDoViO8A+d5LVEubO2qHxX/C8lk+IsPkDdU6R27PWCcNB2e8COs90B7GqGbAht+dm82 +KnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhjlqjX5JZqULkCVk7UMcLs2bt6W/3b+lvWBIi2lu0vsk1ij2D mFOgACJ7iHknCdA+jZwT1nIb1UjVugkXOhxww0P1Rg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzavKYECfP2dyl6jisNZICvZHCn/2oLdhv426Prx1n2C7n5kooQbC6ED/AkpXUYUfyxgfQUw6WyHLp+Gh1lqQ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4bd1:: with SMTP id x17mr11103599ejv.181.1576780194372; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:29:53 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:29:52 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Cc:,, Stig Venaas <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005fe14f059a12bf1d"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:29:57 -0000


It has been almost 2 months since I sent out this review, and I haven’t
heard anything back.  I know that the document needs significant work — how
is it going?



On October 23, 2019 at 12:17:03 PM, Alvaro Retana (

I just finished reviewing this document.  I don't have a lot of comments on
the model itself (please see below), but the document needs significant
work to live up to rfc8407 (Guidelines for YANG Documents) and the specific
requirements mentioned there for YANG documents.  In general, compare this
document with draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang (which was written by almost the
same author team).  Items from rfc8407 that are not addressed in this
document include:
I will wait for a revision, and for any major issues identified inline
before starting the IETF LC.