Re: [pim] [IANA #1266746] expert review for draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing (pim-parameters)

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Thu, 02 March 2023 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C572CC14CE38 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:59:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WM_OrQ4jkH-t for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F19C151AE9 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id cy23so3182273edb.12 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 14:59:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1677797990; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=idTeA7zcauDjsXXkxMQot3CnwkTj54xPxc0DkfDeEV8=; b=vw8Ek9rcf9ndty0zxU0DNFzv5zckQa+o1fLrySwz+bFzi0RjsQCmzCybqg+6+5VQg+ 3f2eZKTfi0EnY9ex8mrQfje/qOVFFHyqPzvoMZ7raaaWf8PM29xkAiAfCLNpA0ZAhn5D /dXFVFwqE8A3+rFKidAurbPTm3iy6ov0Ico0gmVW2bYMCLhy3cemMvjK98tjoBELKzC4 6PxTeBIu5lS9juE71NeKDCtPzq8Hfrt9dwuplVAXIdp72gWJ20WPJlWINWFEtnh890WD bUpHnJMQxlXHpnYOMHSkn8c96GhP1ze6GhZh1ifunVrSTo17g68cdmLr2vdMaK9yZ+jb 6J6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677797990; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=idTeA7zcauDjsXXkxMQot3CnwkTj54xPxc0DkfDeEV8=; b=c8XPWGZ045V7dALwtnmHO1mPBuzAl51Vt7W9NfWyXutKCfKUCu5I+u1Cg5gXaYF7nm VZ95cuzA0NztFCyn+TXyDYT4Gu1nfVpU4A+HVc+eblg6FFZ6JqLAmIrnP94DB6XSrGcn vCOwFtpWVfFpAPHj+0qSUTA6rq5T54+Rld2IuRufG5iUkDZFeKgSkwxDex8GaLmJX73l s0uK6vmOhJ9/6AHLsb5VR+B+KadEhuZzh8/CG2xLyXZkQbdJMGwPimnSq1QWnugTJzxA pTQqKi/BAbbOeXTyo0O7LujO82noUJ1v/B+u8pjvdJe4iKR19cJNv+RpQgkAC0BiigoO HKlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWG1oFqadoxRDcH75wRNlnGEovstBiuKMEEhHigh2SoM5q22//h KvFMa9qvgUzwsP3ofIuLc+N05tYbhywc1V4YaqKPJw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/Nm7AzV9BIzZLq3gLlcx3Aij0ntinBwofetzFV5XH6feNNVRyBmi3E5d//A+xoPgaGDMOpxnV91qBnVlcMqg4=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d714:0:b0:4bb:d098:2138 with SMTP id t20-20020a50d714000000b004bbd0982138mr4421382edi.5.1677797990271; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 14:59:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1266746@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-233437-1676667366-941.1266746-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-231510-1676667654-253.1266746-9-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-231510-1676667654-253.1266746-9-0@icann.org>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 14:59:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHANBt+FZktZ9k0jQA8+4GC_WdQLswWjVZPUiZ3qcquSNYw=og@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: stig@cisco.com, zzhang@juniper.net, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/s6c5wSyo74pK99IXQdq0QXkB2jI>
Subject: Re: [pim] [IANA #1266746] expert review for draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing (pim-parameters)
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 22:59:56 -0000

Hi David

The IANA considerations look good.

There is an IETF process issue though. Copying Alvaro who is the AD
for this document, but he is aware.

If you see in this draft, and the registry, the bits are marked as
reserved. But they should have been unassigned.
This is being fixed with
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-00.html that
we are trying to get published soon.

I guess the assert-packing draft publication might wait for that draft
to be published, so at the time the IANA assignment will be done, the
registry should be updated to show that these are unassigned.

Regards,
Stig


On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:00 PM David Dong via RT
<drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Stig Venaas and Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang (cc: pim WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the PIM-Hello Options registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing for us? Please see:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing/
>
> The due date is March 3rd, 2023.
>
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pim-parameters/
>
> We'll wait for both reviewers to respond unless you tell us otherwise.
>
> With thanks,
>
> David Dong
> IANA Services Specialist
>
> On Fri Feb 17 20:56:06 2023, david.dong wrote:
> > First, in the PIM-Hello Options registry on the Protocol Independent
> > Multicast (PIM) Parameters registry page located at:
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/pim-parameters/
> >
> > a single, new registration will be made as follows:
> >
> > Value: [ TBD-at-Registration ]
> > Length: 0
> > Name: Packed Assert Capability
> > Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]
> >
> > As this document requests registrations in an Expert Review or
> > Specification Required (see RFC 8126) registry, we will initiate the
> > required Expert Review via a separate request. This review must be
> > completed before the document's IANA state can be changed to "IANA OK.
>