IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] WGLC on removing l2vpn from draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Mon, 11 October 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D293A0D16 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xqGYDVRWo5i for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A37F3A0D08 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id i189so12845269ioa.1 for <pim@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D66o1S+L3ZQD8J4rLLZdERJemW5ik6rmrhirz72sQmo=; b=I2aiZqzgqWEWOO/daukfFTlo2UzmTzslCGB9o/0d5mPpAadOpHstonakIDArb4j3nY OIcarYI1WzHlnNPP0KzJb7fiAdPEgWXH1fRflsnS5EgJ8B3hkvyMqb3/RNI2riY4Ux0Y bseIn+whZr3i5b/DPIKBeW3VIKzVVYGTGEeTU2mocHnUUG+vypxpXH8q2vFmfMtJdP9z JjeUklRCYSFzZdSQxAvnP2fPq5Wn0uT6W5T/QmTSg+fAVMcO4EtYXXYttdbiJW1FIr5T LbUxgLd6guRyztTX2+sy84d71oO7zgdj+qz++S5E+YFj50Px1suBCZ+M1Xfs3lh6SzVS iWhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D66o1S+L3ZQD8J4rLLZdERJemW5ik6rmrhirz72sQmo=; b=mZDa7TYrBRk35y4tmV57bcmt6efX1E4594EbVI53705TGLHL5gUFJ0cl5NWgxqgnoz zi3w2fdOKjLrKJpCLBbiaky8aSR78fZez22cS2JR/tjVzJzpUaxxtBjwmRLCZ4K9/DbY cMPpORDRSIhRdr3BbRug4CHCQsuuy1UFDpNnNCuub7VIZ9zAiRbaAL/4X7SSVzq8q1/N 73RwAGgn32GQtbto4t4k08Mpp6S0LAQ/AliitBYQgz78wXTtdlsvriNcNfpdqqkFoT+G OyJ455F2M+lkfZpKduIDpRScHdFtw7hNTPfNpvuhxXC8LZhQ+NkCM+dSyDaVEHqW2si4 vW1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dMI6R1cLNR3O1WpuqsqDk1POAMdzBsIllPEpaafW5syQgVYht 10TfHqOUQfAbQu+2y3J3hxQ5zguCayicCVhiyPLxXpRO+n8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiUDW1VrppAYVpP12kUUr9H2j76py2KwHMemotET0EYQcWtGFl9cy9QH3N2sp3s1UPEraUMHHJbma4KQlufLc=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:270c:: with SMTP id g12mr19247508jaa.75.1633970985992; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHANBtKYcVcjJp5goaH05hbcmhEG8ygWb-LVhpv4sNaTRmAtOg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEz6PPS657Y1Ow5woKZB0PytqVKBveLr07+oKNG=EmoGL3m97A@mail.gmail.com> <CANYbVFYDLk2HOnDY+Xk-+5v856zvNfv4uDf1QdKME0OhJB3Vng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANYbVFYDLk2HOnDY+Xk-+5v856zvNfv4uDf1QdKME0OhJB3Vng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:49:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtL2-iY81Zv1FWFnWTw3=+upH2=aZukWvZHqirzwTHp_gQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mahesh Sivakumar <sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Cc: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/tymF-GyCN0ouHGeRj2mhLfHuMuM>
Subject: Re: [pim] WGLC on removing l2vpn from draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:49:57 -0000

Hi

I see no concerns being raised, while several people also think this
may improve the document. The publication process with the RFC Editor
will proceed then.

Thanks,
Stig

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:40 AM Mahesh Sivakumar
<sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Support proceeding with the publication.
>
> Thanks
> Mahesh
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:04 AM Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Support proceeding with the publication.
>> Thanks,
>> - Xufeng
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:15 PM Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi working group
>>>
>>> This draft has been in the RFC editors queue for a year or so.
>>> Revision 18 (and earlier) have a normative reference to
>>> draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang, but the work on that has stopped, with no
>>> signs of it being picked up. In order to proceed with publication, the
>>> authors would like to remove l2vpn from the draft in order to get this
>>> published. Revision 19 has l2vpn removed. You can see the diff here:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang-19.txt
>>>
>>> If you have any concerns about removing l2vpn, or have any other
>>> comments, please respond by September 28th 2021. Please respond even
>>> if you have no concerns.
>>>
>>> Unless there are concerns, we can then proceed with the publication.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Stig
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pim mailing list
>>> pim@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pim mailing list
>> pim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email