Re: [pim] Request for Atlanta agenda items

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Thu, 18 October 2012 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF7F21F85ED for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeS1OPV39Qje for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AD621F85EF for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [202.249.37.10]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 193712780B0 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:13:02 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:13:10 +0900
Message-Id: <20121018.181310.230121425.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: pim@ietf.org
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <507C43F3.5010209@venaas.com>
References: <507C43F3.5010209@venaas.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [pim] Request for Atlanta agenda items
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:13:08 -0000

Hello folks,

In the upcoming meeting, I'll present the following two drafts.

1. Explicit tracking
   draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking-02
2. Multiple upstream interfaces support for IGMP/MLD proxy
   draft-asaeda-pim-mldproxy-multif-00

The draft defining the explicit tracking function was presented
several times and this revision clearly describes the default set
(turning off) for the function of eliminating specific query upon
state change report reception, according to the concensus of the last
meeting.
At the next meeting I may ask the document category (again) and the
condition whether it's ready for WGLC to the group.

The second draft, "Multiple upstream interfaces support for IGMP/MLD
proxy", is a new draft, which provides a simple extension for IGMP/
MLD proxy to support multiple upstream interfaces by manual
configuration.
Please take a look at the document.

Regards,
--
Hitoshi Asaeda