[pim] SPTbit clear
황선영 <syhwang@samsung.com> Thu, 23 March 2006 01:04 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMEFU-0007LF-8a; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:04:24 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMEFS-0007LA-Ov for pim@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:04:22 -0500
Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMEFR-00065f-Ag for pim@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:04:22 -0500
Received: from ep_mmp2 (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IWK00BZ12Z7JZ@mailout1.samsung.com> for pim@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:04:19 +0900 (KST)
Received: from syhwang ([10.89.8.196]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0IWK001XS2Z7KF@mmp2.samsung.com> for pim@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:04:19 +0900 (KST)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:58:57 +0900
From: 황선영 <syhwang@samsung.com>
To: pim@ietf.org
Message-id: <010b01c64e14$f70d8a50$c408590a@telecom.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5011df3e2a27abcc044eaa15befcaa87
Subject: [pim] SPTbit clear
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0849931857=="
Errors-To: pim-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, all
I have a question about SPTbit clear.
If SPT bit is set to TRUE and then upstream interface is changed,
then SPTbit should be cleared ?
I think do that, but I cannot find the behavior in draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-12.
U1, U2, R1, D1 is all PIM routers.
U1 U2
| |
| |
+-------- R1 ---------+
|
|
D1
First, SPT for (S,G) is built as U1->R1->D1.
And then R1's unicast route has been changed to U2.
Then R1's (S,G) upstream should be changed.
How about the SPTbit ?
Please let me know which chapter I can refer.
Thanks and regards,
Sunyoung, Hwang
_______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
- [pim] SPTbit clear 황선영
- Re: [pim] SPTbit clear JGSPrasad