Re: Encapsulation protocol
Paul Francis--formerly Tsuchiya <francis@thumper.bellcore.com> Mon, 14 June 1993 15:04 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03687; 14 Jun 93 11:04 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03683; 14 Jun 93 11:04 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09131; 14 Jun 93 11:04 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA26285> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Mon, 14 Jun 93 11:03:17 EDT
Received: from tsuchiya.bellcore.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA26276> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-pip X-pip; Mon, 14 Jun 93 11:03:16 EDT
Received: by tsuchiya.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA11643> for pip@thumper.bellcore.com; Mon, 14 Jun 93 11:03:14 EDT
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1993 11:03:14 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Francis--formerly Tsuchiya <francis@thumper.bellcore.com>
Message-Id: <9306141503.AA11643@tsuchiya.bellcore.com>
To: Garrett.Wollman@uvm.edu, pip@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Encapsulation protocol
> > What protocol is being used to encapsulate PIP over IPv4? If no > protocol has been chosen yet, I would strongly suggest use of protocol > 4, which is just a direct encapsulation of the entire IPgram inside IP Yes, we use 4. This will be documented in the transition spec....which I know is sorely overdue..... PX
- Encapsulation protocol Garrett.Wollman
- Re: Encapsulation protocol Stephen Casner
- Re: Encapsulation protocol Paul Francis--formerly Tsuchiya