[IETF-PKIX] CMP draft question
Gina DePlanche <gmd@OPENROUTE.COM> Wed, 11 February 1998 05:38 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-pkix@LISTS.TANDEM.COM>
Received: from consensus.com (mail.consensus.com [157.22.240.7]) by sparky.wovenword.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA12445 for <tim-mail-work-lists@wovenword.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:38:14 -0800
Received: from talia.mis.tandem.com (130.252.226.155) by consensus.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 1.2); Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:40:10 -0700
Received: from suntan (suntan.tandem.com [192.216.221.8]) by talia.mis.tandem.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA10235; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LISTS.TANDEM.COM by LISTS.TANDEM.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c) with spool id 19499 for IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:34:19 -0800
Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by Tandem.com (8.8.8/2.0.1) with ESMTP id VAA29744 for <IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from talia.mis.tandem.com by relay4.UU.NET with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: talia-100.mis.tandem.com [130.252.226.155]) id QQecem09075; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:11:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from suntan (suntan.tandem.com [192.216.221.8]) by talia.mis.tandem.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA27631 for <IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 15:11:05 -0800 (PST)
Approved-By: jean.pawluk@TANDEM.COM
Received: from marconi (marconi.openroute.com [128.185.123.116] (may be forged)) by Tandem.com (8.8.8/2.0.1) with SMTP id LAA24982 for <ietf-pkix@tandem.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from banacek.proteon.com by marconi (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA26287; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:23:02 -0500
Received: by banacek.proteon.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA19683; Tue, 10 Feb 98 14:23:20 EST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <9802101923.AA19683@banacek.proteon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:23:20 -0500
Reply-To: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM>
Sender: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM>
From: Gina DePlanche <gmd@OPENROUTE.COM>
Subject: [IETF-PKIX] CMP draft question
Comments: To: cadams@entrust.com
To: IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM
Status:
Hi!
I have a question about the root CA fingerprint mentioned in
the CMP draft-ietf-pkix-ipki3cmp-06.txt. I was wondering if someone
could please clarify the procedure in section 4.1. In particular,
in the second paragraph, I find the use of the terms "this information"
and "this value" unclear when several values are referred to in the section.
Also, how does the fingerprint allow an end entity to securely use the CAs
self-certificate, as mentioned in section 4.7.2?
Thank you for your help!
- Gina
--
Gina M. DePlanche | OpenROUTE Networks, Inc.
gmd@openroute.com | A subsidiary of Proteon, Inc.
(508) 898-2800 x2541 | 9 Technology Drive, Westborough, MA
Fax: (508) 836-5347 | 01581-1799 MailStop #23
- [IETF-PKIX] CMP draft question Gina DePlanche
- Re: [IETF-PKIX] CMP draft question Carlisle Adams