[pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5273 (3593)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 April 2013 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA81121F96A0 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4QDwGGMHsQpu for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887D521F9693 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B3CBAB1E004; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: jimsch@nwlink.com, mmyers@fastq.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130416163437.B3CBAB1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:34:37 -0700
Cc: pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5273 (3593)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:35:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5273, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC): Transport Protocols". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5273&eid=3593 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Section: s3 Original Text ------------- "CMC-Request" Corrected Text -------------- "CMC-request" Notes ----- The text before Table 1 indicate the SMIME type parameters is "CMC-Request" but the table uses "CMC-request". I marked this as editorial because I think implementers can figure this out, but I thought I'd submit it anyway Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5273 (draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC): Transport Protocols Publication Date : June 2008 Author(s) : J. Schaad, M. Myers Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5273 (3593) RFC Errata System