IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: some thoughts re DPD and DPV

Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr> Tue, 27 March 2001 11:52 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id GAA16979 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 06:52:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA06862; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:49:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.imc.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:48:55 -0800
Received: from edelweb.fr (edelweb.fr [212.234.46.16]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA06812 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from champagne.edelweb.fr (localhost.edelweb.fr [127.0.0.1]) by edelweb.fr with ESMTP id NAA17067; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from champagne.edelweb.fr (champagne.edelweb.fr [193.51.14.161]) by edelweb.fr (nospam/1.3); Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from emeriau.edelweb.fr (emeriau.edelweb.fr [193.51.14.5]) by champagne.edelweb.fr (8.7.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA16344; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:35 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr>
Received: (sylvest@localhost) by emeriau.edelweb.fr (8.7.6/8.6.6) id NAA13967; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:35 +0200
Message-Id: <200103271148.NAA13967@emeriau.edelweb.fr>
To: Denis.Pinkas@bull.net, stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Subject: Re: some thoughts re DPD and DPV
Cc: kent@bbn.com, ietf-pkix@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe

> 
> Denis,
> 
> > I noticed that your were the single one at the IETF meeting advocating the
> > need for the retryReference. There migh be other individuals present at the
> > meeting or people on the mailing list supporting this idea as well, but up
> > to now they have remain silent. :-)
> 
> That never seems to bother you, so I'm ok with it in this case:-)
> 

There was a discussion on that point some months ago. If I rememeber
it right, in ended in violant agreement among me and Stephen Farrell.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email