[pkix] SMIME ECC encryption

Tom Hans <tomhans18@gmail.com> Sat, 12 September 2020 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tomhans18@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84403A0D90 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ygpnvbdGS81 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7247D3A0C92 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id c10so10190564otm.13 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d5FebZE62GpW8RTufnKCPeCkhPiVlLhW0W13DLrGpAc=; b=pv1296/b2+VkNB0sl7InfebJkfh+6ySHdb3oJMc+rbBFn57bowg+++IBxVAKwSgyJQ /q5aQ4t49tPyB8zWh7I6oTuMM3RXglO/ZIPZsXEMUKqSJwAeMe9zHm1OJibYALkjdHnc GWQBijKhJ+TI3HYFA2LeymdHrK7Xxra/BZIusm3Un29xb/XpoqwP1p9ay8/xJLTgNSfy eDl/MKugbC3JAWzOV016uQdItxcsPrIzP3R+3UIaN8WAzNqNB2IXBBD8pRwotnST+X1E mhvAYTrXd9BqLfeWLVQ3C9guF6bTlfvtfhkPCkCV9Fcv8uqVe4his0iFEf6d3e7JNG04 5L4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d5FebZE62GpW8RTufnKCPeCkhPiVlLhW0W13DLrGpAc=; b=jS6oszRUdfl1UA2NR/nu1uo7+4N41sjOyYmT2SVJt1xhcbucs23ssRTvjfIhz6prF9 ySrltMeAJFlqb1dJWTNDnADFH4vkzQrmg8ObWxCYFjKe/AZlCAh7cyZsMS3DWMmSFvdn 0SJd3zGA5fd/YrPL8fG3cCG0Kl5uiRvGBQhiCVMtLBhn0mM79ZOkK/JjHLFspOGOZ4mS /GeDCje8CPCcCFHzyD/Ze4TryQoOjSH81kEQhYCKUUkh34Ly2eSfJ/ZmLRftlEjQOjmG fO7cgChnBQKA6j+LjTHZb/0OGvLqIPNksA0yiT8xJexdXHYvLRz31pLToylJYLeASMU+ 91Qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325nUHJMwV5zk6pDs8EfEXbesfDiPLaS81+JqXM6s/gQRDXz4S7 G3fhMd9jZx/LgEDR75yEgQvWwEtUmjlCJqne9guEVUjke3w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5CfZLZBazBtNA9QtAVGLNKwLGRtIhzrzA4oMn1qpnWoXNR9vw16f514H2D9wkG/ton/CnEYV9t5OjWmKrvXA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1445:: with SMTP id h63mr3144960oth.343.1599890887407; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:aca:4995:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Hans <tomhans18@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:08:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGWHT=ZvzGh=Lg92ah4v-ZOwxS74U5+peDBfdB_y+k3RF0nGfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: pkix@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005fc6505af17a018"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/H1eGomuIG2kjTfxz_X9fj9vC-1Q>
Subject: [pkix] SMIME ECC encryption
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:08:10 -0000

Hello everyone,

does someone know a working implementation (library/product) for SMIME v4
(RFC 8551) ECC encryption?

It looks like that signing is no issue for everyone but I cannot found any
encryption example.


Kind regards,
Tom