Last Call
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Tue, 30 September 1997 18:06 UTC
Return-Path: <chandras@loc201.tandem.com>
Received: from consensus.com (consensus.com [157.22.1.143]) by sparky.wovenword.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA02572 for <tim-mail-work-lists@wovenword.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 11:06:09 -0700
Received: from suntan.tandem.com (192.216.221.8) by consensus.com with SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 1.2); Tue, 30 Sep 1997 18:08:13 -0700
Received: by suntan.tandem.com (8.6.12/suntan5.970212) for ietf-pkix-relay id PAA22388; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:52:39 -0700
Received: from zafu.bbn.com by suntan.tandem.com (8.6.12/suntan5.970212) for <ietf-pkix@tandem.com> id PAA22379; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:52:38 -0700
Received: from [128.89.30.5] (ARA5.BBN.COM [128.89.30.5]) by zafu.bbn.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA06341 for <ietf-pkix@tandem.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 18:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender: kent@po1.bbn.com (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v03102801b0572f468a78@[128.89.30.17]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 18:53:29 -0400
To: ietf-pkix@tandem.com
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Last Call
Status:
Folks, We have several revised I-Ds that have been posted recently and I'd like to begin the WG last call process. We discussed which I-Ds seemed to be ready for progression during the Munich meeting, as reported in the meeting minutes distributed to this list immediately after the meeting. New versions of several of the documents have been posted and are now ready for a final review. - PKIX Part 1, X.509 certificate and CRL syntax, (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-05.txt), has been in process for a long while. Although I saw a couple of minor syntax changes proposed recently, I assume that we're ready to close the books on this one, modulo resolution of the proposed changes by the authors. - PKIX Part 2 has been split into several pieces. The LDAP portion (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki2opp-03.txt) is now under consideration and I've seen no substantial comments on it. The FTP and HTTP portion, (draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http-00.txt), is also posted, and the only comments I've seen there are relatively minor ones re choice of MIME context types. I'd like to move forward on this one as well. - PKIX Part 3, on certificate management protocols (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki3cmp-04.txt) has also been debated extensively and I would progress this document as well. - PKIX Part IV, certificatecertification practices framework, (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part4-01.txt ) is up for review as an Informational RFC, not standards track. Although not strictly necessary, I would like to get Wg approval to forward this document to the IESG as well. Please send any comments on these I-Ds to the list so that we can determine if any further changes need to to made prior to forwarding the documents to the IESG for IETF-wide last call. Steve
- Last Call Stephen Kent
- Re: Last Call & idea for OCSP Stef Hoeben
- Last Call Stephen Kent