[pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5272 (7627)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 05 September 2023 23:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F5DC14E513; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2W334YanxDj; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA8AC14CE4B; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C2BA4CD7E7; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 16:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: piotr.popis@enigma.com.pl, jimsch@nwlink.com, mmyers@fastq.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, pkix@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230905232116.C2BA4CD7E7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 16:21:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/JR1eEtF5puCY-tAKSWmhmH4yoBY>
Subject: [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5272 (7627)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 23:21:21 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5272, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7627 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Piotr Popis <piotr.popis@enigma.com.pl> Date Reported: 2023-09-04 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 6.7 Original Text ------------- See Section 5 of [CRMF] for a detailed discussion of POP. Corrected Text -------------- See Section 4 of [CRMF] for a detailed discussion of POP. Notes ----- This is a purely editorial change. -------------------------------------- RFC5272 (draft-ietf-pkix-2797-bis-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Publication Date : June 2008 Author(s) : J. Schaad, M. Myers Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF
- [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5272 (7627) RFC Errata System