IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC2510bis

Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr> Wed, 02 April 2003 20:21 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA07538 for <pkix-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:21:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h32IxjJM021848 for <ietf-pkix-bks@above.proper.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h32IxjXv021847 for ietf-pkix-bks; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from edelweb.fr (edelweb.fr [212.234.46.16]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h32IxhJM021841; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from champagne.edelweb.fr (localhost.edelweb.fr [127.0.0.1]) by edelweb.fr with ESMTP id UAA01750; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:59:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from champagne.edelweb.fr (champagne.edelweb.fr [193.51.14.161]) by edelweb.fr (nospam/1.6); Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:59:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from sylvest@localhost) by champagne.edelweb.fr (8.7.6/8.6.6) id UAA27355; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:59:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 20:59:43 +0200
From: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr>
Message-Id: <200304021859.UAA27355@champagne.edelweb.fr>
To: Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr, ietf-pkix@imc.org, phoffman@imc.org
Subject: Re: RFC2510bis
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> 
> See the list archives for the message from 1/30/03 to the ADs, and 
> from the IESG on 2/10/03.

The message says:

   The PKIX WG has completed Last Call and achieved rough consensus on the 
   specification "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate 
   Management Protocols".

When did this happen?

-----

Extract from the minutes of 
PKIX WG Meeting 12/11/01

Edited by Steve Kent

Three RFCs are ready for progression to Draft 
Standard status: CRMF, CMP, and OCSP(v1).


----
From: Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@entrust.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:59:20 -0500 

Hi Francois,

Thanks again for keeping us all up-to-date and for doing your part to keep
various specifications in sync!

I will update 2511bis when I update 2510bis (i.e., immediately after Salt
Lake City) and re-submit both.

Carlisle.

----

Draft 6 appeared at 17-Dec-01


-----

Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 9:8:5 +0800 :
From: carol <wangbingyan@ccit.com.cn>
To: "ietf-pkix@imc.org" <ietf-pkix@imc.org>
Subject: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-06.txt and draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-04.txt

Hi,

  According to the draft themselves, they have expired in June , 2002.

But I couldn't find any new version draft or RFC about rfc2510 and rfc2511.

What's the current status of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-06.txt and draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-04.txt?

----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email