Re: [pkix] draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-04.txt
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 05 August 2011 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E9821F8754 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wV5Dy9MkcbNp for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1259D21F874E for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6247EF2407D; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQEYL4QfbIkg; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:01:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (pool-96-241-176-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.176.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF8FF2407A; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240804ca531f934c5c@[130.129.71.153]>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:01:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <157F34E1-C038-4917-AF2D-485E5728EAC6@vigilsec.com>
References: <p06240804ca531f934c5c@[130.129.71.153]>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: pkix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pkix] draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:01:08 -0000
I have skimmed this document, and I think we should accept it. Russ On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > Folks, > > Jim has posted a revised version of this doc, with a brief secruity > considerations section. The SC section cites 5273 and 5274, and notes that > a few change appear in section 2.12 of this version. > > Please review this SC section and section 2.12 and comment on the list > if there are any concerns. > > Thanks, > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
- [pkix] draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-04.txt Stephen Kent
- Re: [pkix] draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-04.txt Russ Housley