[pkix] Re: RFC5280 errata (5802)
Santosh Chokhani <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com> Tue, 04 June 2024 13:13 UTC
Return-Path: <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9908C14EB19; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HCmAF7N7Swr; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23739C14F6E2; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-44026036ecdso1944881cf.3; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 06:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717506794; x=1718111594; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3ro4o77CLsrjbO9KIguH+BlvlLpZvqFXLXert4zdIOQ=; b=S5CtDC3ZjO6mq5Gxn8UnqGR0/cK8AemV81SoTftoBelPkp3z+/pUz04v0C5gd4e9+J pP+LRvkbYhg3iPbzOqzhuLDGH3+oBrGpKzGxRnx+hsFZsogzzPk7KWwKYUjSF7mHTiaw fHV8zi5DrzTFynJIITuf8ftKP8JJ3IrPH9sZIzZjbDU1/b2pvbwMoMahOfWltEkqQyZq xN94RuqjaYopYdzLLgo6iyYwa7TesWRluCTMUd29MTr9+8r56A3zPdFTlrs3GkQUOlTM J2wE5NZ4QryQOC+a7lmrW2nOwUPFSYOipUhohqvb9k4rRT3GQUU0VZOs0k/46CMADuud nivg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717506794; x=1718111594; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3ro4o77CLsrjbO9KIguH+BlvlLpZvqFXLXert4zdIOQ=; b=JlEkBvuha2LV/TA3z33KfClHGHTLfkGXBHkV0RYUXGa1zlm2D9Fy4nO7MjK9FS1Q3Z P1xlaIW652CwoSrVJll36NNmp3XNZbK8DSAn8mQZMDf5RNLOVp0hpQqXofDmnBRKhn7c QwwUbWFH2Ly9E/HpqEwau1WlDVi6wOpOU6i36Ys74PzsLE/x2ozOwIjLTvrIfRkcaFQX a6xhqjZczqOs53E/fpwbTJdrL3YgDk5PY3AMsSigFnrgragwKXSHPR9DExUkh/dh4jm8 pqMlw54m7wlfNpl+/btoxElgOlERFSWECQXbjcpNICTPtK3rRBQowj+0LnCZhZanH1Kd kHxA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV2lEIP5pvbziug15+kh9DbF+SvuguLoJNw5QspGzUE4cIbxnYzkwQrG4fFpp+lf0gO81+ASwl9Fw9gbJemxptU7mylO8zkaM42NKZq6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzfZoPwS5ILdPiItNvghp3+c6xiv78xvS2kluLZXCyyg+aTuRPf +cdlJS3ve4CdJdAFOn5qR5aBCimLoOu7yoW6v4Z21Z/jZrvKr/H3xp+1/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8uUuZEjp0KWsPeWeVLajpUlFCafGnQ4NAFnao2HLy5Bz/fLJ+67VB0x1ohrfb4F1x1bedqw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a24:b0:43e:607:f4d3 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-43ff54ff71dmr113918161cf.48.1717506793533; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SantoshBrain (pool-71-114-70-176.washdc.dsl-w.verizon.net. [71.114.70.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-43ff23a1669sm49284961cf.20.2024.06.04.06.13.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jun 2024 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Santosh Chokhani <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com>
To: 'Deb Cooley' <debcooley1@gmail.com>, 'IETF PKIX' <pkix@ietf.org>, 'LAMPS WG' <spasm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 09:13:13 -0400
Message-ID: <07ee01dab680$f5120940$df361bc0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_07EF_01DAB65F.6E01C8D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: Adq2f4lISSuHTBC1QiqWzqyfEXE4Fw==
Content-Language: en-us
Message-ID-Hash: MLQ3MPDV7LBD6FJZ2QRKGO5PFHJIOXTT
X-Message-ID-Hash: MLQ3MPDV7LBD6FJZ2QRKGO5PFHJIOXTT
X-MailFrom: santosh.chokhani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pkix.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [pkix] Re: RFC5280 errata (5802)
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/NdlbcFkJq3EzpF9VhvC3ss0zWF0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pkix-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pkix-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pkix-leave@ietf.org>
Deb, I agree with the erratum 5802. While one could argue it to be “editorial”, I would say it is a change that should be made sooner rather than later. From: Deb Cooley [mailto:debcooley1@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 6:04 AM To: IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>; LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>; Santosh Chokhani <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com> Subject: RFC5280 errata Here is the list of errata for RFC 5280. Are they correct, incorrect, or is there debate about it. Let me know which it is, and I'll mark them either 'verified', 'rejected', or 'hold for document update'. You can find the details here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5280 There are 8 that are listed as 'reported'. 3986 5802 5938 6414 6830 7164 7634 7661
- [pkix] Re: RFC5280 errata (5802) Santosh Chokhani