RE: Ordering of RDN's within the DN
Peter Williams <peterw@valicert.com> Wed, 27 December 2000 19:06 UTC
Received: from ns.secondary.com (ns.secondary.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA20475 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:06:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA25793; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.imc.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:00:09 -0800
Received: from ext-mail.valicert.com (ns1.valicert.com [63.65.221.10]) by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25659 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by ext-mail.valicert.com (PMDF V5.2-33 #46613) id <0G6800E01QAJ1F@ext-mail.valicert.com> for ietf-pkix@imc.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:03:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from polaris.valicert.com ([192.168.2.34]) by ext-mail.valicert.com (PMDF V5.2-33 #46613) with ESMTP id <0G680053XQAJVD@ext-mail.valicert.com>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:03:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by exchange.valicert.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <ZLX2SL6S>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:00:24 -0800
Content-return: allowed
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:00:17 -0800
From: Peter Williams <peterw@valicert.com>
Subject: RE: Ordering of RDN's within the DN
To: "'Covey, Carlin'" <ccovey@cylink.com>, ietf-pkix@imc.org
Message-id: <613B3C619C9AD4118C4E00B0D03E7C3E182B41@exchange.valicert.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
NADF was one standards organization (defunct, but at one time respected by our leaders) that specifies a naming architecture that structures and organizes certain namespaces, by RDN. The architecture was founded on the need for cooperative management of a shared namespace by competitive providers. The NBDF addressed the issues in focus in a public directory in which otherwise privately-managed names(disclosing considerable intelligence about a company) would be partially disclosed. NADF essentially specified a "Bridge-Directory". There was a specific naming concept that interact with PKI DN naming - where cert DNs and directory DNs are not the same, to accomodate realworld needs for name management and name distribution privacy requirements. http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc1417.html -----Original Message----- From: Covey, Carlin [mailto:ccovey@cylink.com] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 8:58 AM To: ietf-pkix@imc.org Subject: Ordering of RDN's within the DN Does anyone know of a standard ordering for the RDN's for locality, state, and postalCode when they appear in a DN? - Carlin Covey Cylink Corp.
- Ordering of RDN's within the DN Covey, Carlin
- Re: Ordering of RDN's within the DN Russ Housley
- RE: Ordering of RDN's within the DN Peter Williams
- RE: Ordering of RDN's within the DN Paul Lambert