Re: Embedded certificate image
Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 15:08 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322EF28C280 for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYXzH50Mo3qw for <ietfarch-pkix-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C6028C290 for <pkix-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UEhnP0083392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:43:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n6UEhnct083391; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:43:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.95.113]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6UEhdxZ083380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:43:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from stefan@aaa-sec.com)
Received: (qmail 88643 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 14:43:42 -0000
Received: from s34.loopia.se (HELO s29.loopia.se) ([194.9.94.70]) (envelope-sender <stefan@aaa-sec.com>) by s87.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; 30 Jul 2009 14:43:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 44315 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 14:43:37 -0000
Received: from static-88.131.106.162.addr.tdcsong.se (HELO [10.133.3.238]) (stefan@fiddler.nu@[88.131.106.162]) (envelope-sender <stefan@aaa-sec.com>) by s29.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for <tmiller@mitre.org>; 30 Jul 2009 14:43:37 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:43:36 +0200
Subject: Re: Embedded certificate image
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
To: "Miller, Timothy J." <tmiller@mitre.org>, ietf-pkix <ietf-pkix@imc.org>
Message-ID: <C6977E38.3A4E%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Thread-Topic: Embedded certificate image
Thread-Index: AcoJ6a+BhbDwMA2b20+h06qSltpcaAAXuBOMAZOvk3QAIg+JwAABJIqR
In-Reply-To: <17FD76C1ECD0AB49817637E21809ABF906BDEDF6F3@IMCMBX2.MITRE.ORG>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Understood, However, I can't escape that it feels a bit warped if we abandon useful features because we must design protocols to resist weak hashes instead of making sure that we can and do use adequate hash algorithms. On the second point, the data in both SVG and PDF/A are highly structured. SVG is for example an XML based vector graphic language. /Stefan On 09-07-30 4:16 PM, "Miller, Timothy J." <tmiller@mitre.org> wrote: >> Russ came up with a concern that all hash attacks loves big chunks of >> random data that can be used to create collisions. Counter arguments is >> that this is only a concern is a week hash is used and also that the >> data has some structure as it is base64 encoded. > > Since no-one knows what the next weakness in any hash will be, this isn't a > valid counter-argument to Russ's point, IMHO. SHA1 could be completely > broken tomorrow. > > Sotirov, Stevens, Lenstra, et.al. would have had an easier time, I should > think, if there was a big chunk of data in each cert *other* than they key. > Also, the actual image data is largely unstructrured past the image header; > but any structure in this data is largely immaterial to a collision > construction attack. > > -- Tim >
- Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Thomas Hardjono
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Thomas Hardjono
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Anders Rundgren
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Anders Rundgren
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Peter Gutmann
- RE: Embedded certificate image Yoav Nir
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Peter Gutmann
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Peter Gutmann
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Jim Schaad
- RE: Embedded certificate image Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Timothy J. Miller
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- Re: Embedded certificate image Moudrick M. Dadashov
- Re: Embedded certificate image Tom Gindin
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Timothy J. Miller
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- Re: Embedded certificate image Timothy J. Miller
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- Re: Embedded certificate image Timothy J. Miller
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson
- Re: Embedded certificate image Tom Gindin
- Re: Embedded certificate image Timothy J. Miller
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- RE: Embedded certificate image Kemp, David P.
- RE: Embedded certificate image Santosh Chokhani
- RE: Embedded certificate image Kemp, David P.
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stephen Farrell
- RE: Embedded certificate image Stephen Kent
- Re: Embedded certificate image Stefan Santesson